SBUA 3.3 Review

SBUA 3.3 Review

9th Grade

20 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

The Giver: Chapters 1-13 Review

The Giver: Chapters 1-13 Review

8th - 11th Grade

20 Qs

Author's Purpose

Author's Purpose

8th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Research 101

Research 101

6th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

English III Review 1

English III Review 1

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Why Do Some Brains Enjoy Fear?

Why Do Some Brains Enjoy Fear?

9th - 12th Grade

22 Qs

The Flowers of Algernon

The Flowers of Algernon

8th Grade - University

25 Qs

Flowers for Algernon: Progress Report 13

Flowers for Algernon: Progress Report 13

8th - 12th Grade

21 Qs

EOG Vocabulary

EOG Vocabulary

5th Grade - University

20 Qs

SBUA 3.3 Review

SBUA 3.3 Review

Assessment

Passage

English

9th Grade

Hard

R.2.2, R.2.1, R.2.3

+3

Standards-aligned

Created by

Chloe Calhoun

Used 6+ times

FREE Resource

20 questions

Show all answers

1.

MATCH QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Match the following

emotion

ethos

logic/reason

logos

ethics/ credibility

pathos

Tags

R.2.3

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

How does the author use print and graphic features to support his or her claims about intelligence? (R.2.1)

The author uses the heading to elaborate on a key term and includes the graph to show that global IQ has sometimes decreased.

The author uses the heading to explain the graphic and includes the graph to show that global IQ has always climbed at the same steady pace.

The author uses the heading to organize the text by topic and includes the graph to illustrate the point made in the text that intelligence around the world is increasing.

The author uses the heading to highlight different types of intelligence and includes the graph to show that intelligence is related to how much television people watch.

Tags

R.2.1

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

PART A: Which statement best describes the rhetorical appeals that the writer uses in paragraph 7? (R.2.2)

The writer makes an appeal to credibility by citing Darwin and an appeal to emotion by discussing the process of adapting behavior.

  1. The writer makes an appeal to credibility by citing Darwin and an appeal to emotion by saying overeducation can break someone’s spirit. 

The writer makes an appeal to credibility by mentioning his high IQ and an appeal to emotion by discussing the process of adapting behavior.

The writer makes an appeal to credibility by discussing educational funding and an appeal to emotion by saying overeducation can break someone’s spirit.

Tags

R.2.2

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

PART B: Evaluate how the author uses rhetorical appeals to develop the central idea of paragraph 7. (R.2.2)

The suggestion that people should be protected from over-education “breaking their spirit” is unethical because it can be used to deprive people of educational opportunities.

The suggestion that people should be protected from over-education “breaking their spirit” is reasonable because it ensures that people receive a level of education appropriate for their abilities.

The belief in the heritability of intelligence is illogical because all the scientific studies have disproved it.

The belief in the heritability of intelligence is logical because Darwin suggested this in the 19th century.

Tags

R.2.2

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

Which statement best evaluates the validity and effectiveness of the claims in the two paragraphs? (R.2.4)

The claim made by the Point article seems valid and more effective than the Counterpoint because it cites a stud

The claim made by the Point article seems valid and more effective than the Counterpoint because it discusses genetic factors that determine intelligence.

The claim made by the Counterpoint article seems valid and more effective than the Point article because it lists specific IQ scores. The Point article describes only more general qualities of intelligence.

The claim made by the Counterpoint article seems valid and more effective than the Point article because it cites multiple human studies. The Point article cites only a chimpanzee study.

Tags

R.2.4

6.

CLASSIFICATION QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

The authors of the Point and Counterpoint articles both provide evidence to support their claims about intelligence. Sort each statement evaluating the validity of their claims to show which applies to “Point: Intelligence: It’s All in the Genes”, “Counterpoint: Your Childhood IQ Does Not Limit You”, or both. (R.2.4)

Groups:

(a) Point: Intelligence: It’s All in the Gen

,

(b) Counterpoint: Your Childhood IQ Does Not

,

(c) Both

Acknowledges the complex factors of determining one's intelligence and impact on future success.

Writer bases his claim on data and statistics drawn from scientific studies

Writer bases his claim on personal experiences and observations

Acknowledges genetics as a crucial predictor and the implications of ignoring the heritability a

Tags

R.2.4

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

In Counterpoint: Your Childhood IQ Does Not Limit You, how does the author effectively refute the claim that the majority of one’s intelligence is inherited?

By detailing the lack of skills one has at birth to emphasize the importance of environmental factors to increase intelligence.

By demonstrating how correlation and IQ tests are insufficient tests to determine one's intelligence, regardless of the type of test.

By providing research findings that emphasize the malleability of intelligence over time and the significant role played by environmental factors.

By neglecting Charles Darwin's perspective on intelligence evolution and natural selection, suggesting that Darwin's ideas are not relevant to the discussion.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?