Corpo and Partnership

Corpo and Partnership

University

12 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Audit Quiz

Audit Quiz

University

15 Qs

Foreign Trade

Foreign Trade

University

10 Qs

Corpo Law

Corpo Law

University

14 Qs

Ch-2 CPA

Ch-2 CPA

KG - Professional Development

17 Qs

MICE Review Quiz

MICE Review Quiz

University

10 Qs

ch-6 kewajian hukum KAP

ch-6 kewajian hukum KAP

KG - Professional Development

16 Qs

Environmental Ethics Review

Environmental Ethics Review

12th Grade - University

15 Qs

Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship

Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship

University

10 Qs

Corpo and Partnership

Corpo and Partnership

Assessment

Quiz

Professional Development

University

Easy

Created by

Raymund Camarillo

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

12 questions

Show all answers

1.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

What are the rights of a stockholder?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

2.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

A leased 2 buildings owned by B. A failed to pay the rentals which caused B to file for unlawful detainer against A. A, during the pendency of the case, transferred several properties to C Corp. A non-stock corporation. B won the case, and the Sheriff levied the property of C Corporation. A argued that such property cannot be levied invoking the doctrine of separate juridical personality.

A. Is A correct? Why.

B. Is the doctrine of piercing the corporate fiction applicable to a Non-Stock Corporation?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

3.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

A, B, C, and D agreed to form two mining corporations, namely ABCD Corpoartion. ABCD Corporation has Authorized Capital Stock of P1,000,000 divided equally to the 4 stockholders. A,B, and C were able to pay their stocks in full, but D was not able to pay half of his obligation. A decided to release D from his obligation. B and C objected as it is unfair to them.

A. Can A release D from his obligation?

B. What is Trust Fund Doctrine and when it is violated.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

4.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

ABC Bank filed a complaint-affidavit alleging that DEF (former chairman and CEO) and GHI (former COO) of the ABC Bank authorized the payment of bonuses to corporate officers and directors without proper board authority, despite knowing that substantial losses of ABC Bank's subsidiary, CBA. DOJ task force on Bank fraud cases found probable cause against DEF and GHI for violation of Sec. 31 of the Corporation Code. However, DOJ Sec ruled that Sec. 144 of the same code, which provides for penalties for violations of the code, was no applicable to violations of Sec. 31.

a. Is Sec. 31 of the Corporation code a penal provision?

b. Is the DOJ Sec erred in ruling that Sec. 144 is not applicable for violation of Sec. 31 of the Corporation Code?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

5.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

C is a former employee of Salili Corp. owned by Saliha. C was hired as president and general manager of Salili corp. Saliha then discovered from her friend that C was rendering services in the business location of Salili Corp but the receipts and vouchers given by C is from Klein and Gianni Corporation (her newly formed corporation.)

Salili filed a case against C for the unauthorized use of their properties in organizing their corporation and obtained opportunities properly belonging to it to their damage and prejudice.

a. What is corporate opportunity doctrine?

b. what are the elements of doctrine of corporate opportunity?

c. Did C violates the abovementioned doctrine?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

6.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

ABC Corp directors agreed to the dissolution of the corporation voluntarily. As their legal advisor, explain how will they dissolve the corporation if they still have a creditor.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

7.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

15 mins • 10 pts

A and B was employed by C Corporation. Then they were notified of their termination on the ground of cessation of operation due to serious business losses. A and B believed that their dismissal was without just cause and such cessation of business was a mere pretense in order to transfer its operations to its wholly owned corporation, CC Corporation its parent corporation.

C Corporation argued that the cessation was due to the steady decline in the demand of its products due to global recession, stiffer competition, and the effects of a changing markets.

A. What is the Doctrine of Separate Juridical Personality?

B. Can CC Corporation be held liable? Explain.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?