Cultural variations in attachment

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) used researchers located _____studies of attachment

• 23

• 32

• 30

• 20

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) conducted their research in ____ countries

• 5

• 6

• 7

• 8

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) studied ________

• 2000 adults

• 1999 children

• 1990 children

• 1990 adults

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) used a ________

• controlled observation

• case study

• meta-analysis

• experiment

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) found that in all countries __________ was the most common

• secure attachment (Type B)

• insecure resistant (Type C)

• insecure avoidant (Type A)

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) found that in individualistic cultures rates of ____________ attachment was similar to Ainsworth’s original sample at 14%

• secure attachment (Type B)

• insecure resistant (Type C)

• insecure avoidant (Type A)

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) found that in collectivist samples from China, Japan and Isreal rates were above 25% for ______________

• secure attachment (Type B)

• insecure resistant (Type C)

• insecure avoidant (Type A)

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) found that in general individualistic cultures had higher rates of __________ than collectivist

• secure attachment (Type B)

• insecure resistant (Type C)

• insecure avoidant (Type A)

Simonelli et al (2014) conducted a study in Italy to see whether the proportions of babies of differentt attachment types still matches those found in previous studies. They found 50% were ______

• Secure attachment (Type B)

• Insecure resistant (Type C)

• Insecure avoidant (Type A)

Simonelli et al (2014) conducted a study in Italy to see whether the proportions of babies of differentt attachment types still matches those found in previous studies. They found 36% were _________

• Secure attachment (Type B)

• Insecure resistant (Type C)

• Insecure avoidant (Type A)