Text Evidence in Supporting Interpretations

Discuss the importance of using text evidence to support interpretations in literary analysis.

• Using personal opinions without evidence is sufficient for literary analysis

• Text evidence adds depth and validity to interpretations by grounding them in the actual text, making the analysis more persuasive and convincing.

• Text evidence is unnecessary and distracts from the interpretation

• Interpretations should solely rely on the reader's intuition without referencing the text

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Provide an example of how direct quotes from a text can enhance the credibility of your analysis.

• Direct quotes from a text can enhance the credibility of your analysis by being fabricated.

• Direct quotes from a text can enhance the credibility of your analysis by providing concrete evidence to support your interpretations.

• Direct quotes from a text can enhance the credibility of your analysis by providing irrelevant information.

• Direct quotes from a text can enhance the credibility of your analysis by contradicting your main points.

Tags

CCSS.RL.2.6

CCSS.RL.8.3

How can the context of a text influence the interpretation of the evidence presented?

• The context of a text can influence the interpretation of the evidence presented by providing additional information or perspectives that can change how the evidence is understood.

• The context of a text always confirms the evidence presented

• The context of a text is irrelevant when analyzing evidence

• The context of a text has no impact on the interpretation of evidence

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Discuss the difference between summarizing a text and using text evidence to support an interpretation.

• Summarizing requires personal opinions, while using text evidence relies on facts.

• The difference lies in summarizing focusing on the main points of the text, while using text evidence involves citing specific examples to support an interpretation.

• Summarizing a text involves creating a new story, while using text evidence means making up examples.

• Summarizing focuses on minor details, while using text evidence focuses on generalizations.

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.2

CCSS.RI.11-12.2

CCSS.RI.8.2

CCSS.RL.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

In what ways can text evidence be misinterpreted or taken out of context in an analysis?

• Taking text evidence out of context enhances the analysis

• Misinterpretation of text evidence is impossible

• Text evidence is always accurate and cannot be misinterpreted

• Text evidence can be misinterpreted or taken out of context in an analysis if it is selectively quoted, lacks surrounding context, is manipulated through editing, or if the reader has preconceived biases.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

How can original commentary help strengthen the connection between text evidence and interpretations?

• Original commentary confuses the interpretation by introducing irrelevant information

• Original commentary limits the interpretation by focusing too much on the text evidence

• Original commentary undermines the interpretation by contradicting the text evidence

• Original commentary adds depth and clarity to interpretations by explaining the relevance, implications, and connections of the text evidence to the broader context.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Provide an example of how personal experiences or beliefs can impact the interpretation of text evidence.

• Everyone interprets text evidence in the same way

• An example of how personal experiences or beliefs can impact the interpretation of text evidence is when someone reads a news article about a political issue. Depending on their political beliefs, they may interpret the evidence presented in the article differently, leading to contrasting conclusions.

• Beliefs always align with the evidence presented in texts

• Personal experiences have no impact on interpreting text evidence

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Explain the concept of 'close reading' and how it can aid in the analysis of text evidence.

• Close reading is a detailed analysis of a text to reveal deeper meanings and insights, aiding in the examination of text evidence.

• Close reading is a method that encourages readers to ignore the context of a text.

• Close reading focuses solely on the author's biography rather than the text itself.

• Close reading involves skimming through a text quickly without analyzing it in detail.

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.10

CCSS.RI.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.11-12.10

CCSS.RL.8.10

CCSS.RL.9-10.10

Discuss the ethical considerations involved in using text evidence to support interpretations.

• Consider the source's credibility, biases, context, and impact of selective quoting. Ensure accurate representation, respect intellectual property rights, and avoid misinterpretation or manipulation of evidence.

• Misinterpret or manipulate evidence intentionally

• Use text evidence without considering context

• Ignore the source's credibility and biases

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1