Understanding Shaw v. Reno: A Deep Dive into Gerrymandering

Understanding Shaw v. Reno: A Deep Dive into Gerrymandering

11th Grade

10 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

AP Legislative Branch Quiz

AP Legislative Branch Quiz

11th - 12th Grade

13 Qs

Shaw v Reno

Shaw v Reno

11th Grade - University

15 Qs

Required SCOTUS Cases Quiz

Required SCOTUS Cases Quiz

9th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

AP Gov Supreme Court Cases

AP Gov Supreme Court Cases

10th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

AP Gov Required SCOTUS Cases

10th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases

KG - Professional Development

16 Qs

Required SCOTUS cases

Required SCOTUS cases

11th - 12th Grade

14 Qs

Understanding Shaw vs. Reno and Gerrymandering

Understanding Shaw vs. Reno and Gerrymandering

9th - 12th Grade

15 Qs

Understanding Shaw v. Reno: A Deep Dive into Gerrymandering

Understanding Shaw v. Reno: A Deep Dive into Gerrymandering

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

11th Grade

Easy

Created by

Jason Thompson

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main issue addressed in Shaw v. Reno?

Partisan gerrymandering

Campaign finance

Voter ID laws

Racial gerrymandering

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the Justice Department suggest North Carolina do after reviewing their district plan?

Attempt to create a second majority-black district

Dissolve the existing majority-black district

Create a third majority-black district

Maintain the status quo

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does gerrymandering refer to?

Drawing district lines without bias

Redrawing district lines to favor a specific race

The process of voting

Redistricting based on population changes

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between partisan and racial gerrymandering?

Partisan is about election timing, racial is about district shapes

Partisan favors a political party, racial favors a racial group

There is no difference

Racial is legal, but partisan is not

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What constitutional principle was at stake in Shaw v. Reno?

Freedom of speech

Right to privacy

Right to bear arms

Equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Shaw's group argue in Shaw v. Reno?

The districts were fairly drawn

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was outdated

The equal protection clause was violated

Racial gerrymandering was necessary

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the role of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in Shaw v. Reno?

It was irrelevant to the case

It mandated district approval by the federal government

It was found unconstitutional

It supported the creation of majority-black districts

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?