Search Header Logo

Mapp v. Ohio and Marbury v. Madison

Authored by Michael D

Social Studies

12th Grade

Used 1+ times

Mapp v. Ohio and Marbury v. Madison
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Mapp v. Ohio, what was the primary issue?

Freedom of speech

Right to bear arms

Unlawful search and seizure

Right to a fair trial

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of Mapp v. Ohio?

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mapp

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ohio

The case was dismissed without a ruling

The case was remanded to a lower court

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the central issue in Marbury v. Madison?

Freedom of religion

Judicial review

Right to privacy

Freedom of the press

4.

CATEGORIZE QUESTION

3 mins • 12 pts

Match the case with its outcome:


Groups:

(a) Mapp v. Ohio

,

(b) Marbury v. Madison

,

(c) Grutter v. Bollinger

,

(d) Hernandez v Texas

Solidified the Supreme Court as coequal

struck down a Texas state law that excluded Mexican Americans from juries

consider race as a factor in admissions

Established Exclusionary rule

the principle of judicial review

declare acts of Congress unconstitutional

violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause

Fourth Amendment rights

illegal searches and seizures cannot be used in court

affirmative action in educational institutions

consider race as a factor in admissions to promote diversity

Mexican Americans had the right to serve on juries

5.

REORDER QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Arrange the following events in the correct chronological order:

  • Marbury v. Madison case decided by the Supreme Court

  1. Judiciary Act of 1789 passed by Congress

  • Mapp v. Ohio argued before the Supreme Court

6.

FILL IN THE BLANKS QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

  1. Marbury v. Madison established the principle of (a)   , which allows the Supreme Court to invalidate laws passed by Congress if they are unconstitutional.

7.

FILL IN THE BLANKS QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

  1. In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained through (a)   searches and seizures cannot be used in court.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?