Debate between Freedom and Determinism

According to Steven Cahn, what is the fundamental question in the debate between freedom and determinism?

• Can we be held morally responsible for our actions?

• Do we have control over our choices and decisions?

• Is human behavior predictable or unpredictable?

• Can science explain human behavior?

Which of the following statements best describes Cahn's position on freedom and determinism?

• He argues that human behavior is entirely determined by factors outside of our control.

• He believes that human behavior is entirely free and uncaused.

• He suggests that human behavior is a combination of both free and determined elements.

• He argues that the concept of freedom is irrelevant to human behavior.

According to Cahn, what is the significance of the concept of "compatibilism" in the debate between freedom and determinism?

• It argues that freedom and determinism are mutually exclusive.

• It suggests that freedom and determinism are compatible and complementary.

• It argues that human behavior is entirely determined by factors outside of our control.

• It believes that human behavior is entirely free and uncaused.

Which of the following examples would Cahn likely use to illustrate the concept of compatibilism?

• A person choosing to eat a salad for lunch.

• A person being forced to eat a salad for lunch.

• A person eating a salad for lunch because of a prior decision.

• A person eating a salad for lunch due to a genetic predisposition.

According to Cahn, what is the implication of compatibilism for moral responsibility?

• It suggests that we are never morally responsible for our actions.

• It argues that we are always morally responsible for our actions.

• It suggests that moral responsibility is a matter of degree.

• It argues that moral responsibility is irrelevant to human behavior.

Answer explanation

According to Cahn, compatibilism implies that moral responsibility is a matter of degree, not absolute.

According to Susan Wolf, what is the primary concern of her argument about sanity and responsibility?

• To define the boundaries of moral responsibility

• To explore the relationship between sanity and moral agency

• To argue for a more nuanced understanding of moral responsibility

• To challenge the concept of moral responsibility altogether

Answer explanation

The primary concern of Susan Wolf's argument is to argue for a more nuanced understanding of moral responsibility.

Which of the following statements best describes Wolf's position on sanity and responsibility?

• She argues that only sane individuals can be held morally responsible for their actions.

• She believes that moral responsibility requires a high degree of rationality and self-control.

• She suggests that moral responsibility is not solely dependent on sanity or rationality.

• She argues that moral responsibility is irrelevant to considerations of sanity.

Answer explanation

She suggests that moral responsibility is not solely dependent on sanity or rationality.

According to Wolf, what is the significance of the concept of "deep rationality" in understanding moral responsibility?

• It refers to the ability to make rational decisions based on complete information.

• It describes the capacity for self-reflection and moral introspection.

• It encompasses both rational and non-rational aspects of human decision-making.

• It is irrelevant to moral responsibility.

Answer explanation

The concept of 'deep rationality' in understanding moral responsibility encompasses both rational and non-rational aspects of human decision-making, as per Wolf.

Which of the following examples would Wolf likely use to illustrate the concept of deep rationality?

• A person carefully weighing the pros and cons of a decision.

• A person acting on impulse without reflection.

• A person making a decision based on both reason and emotion.

• A person following a moral rule without question.

Answer explanation

Wolf would likely use the example of a person making a decision based on both reason and emotion to illustrate the concept of deep rationality.

According to Wolf, what is the implication of her argument for our understanding of moral responsibility?

• We should hold individuals strictly accountable for their actions.

• We should only hold sane individuals morally responsible.

• We should consider a range of factors, including sanity and rationality, when assigning moral responsibility.

• We should abandon the concept of moral responsibility altogether.

Answer explanation

According to Wolf, the implication of her argument for our understanding of moral responsibility is that we should consider a range of factors, including sanity and rationality, when assigning moral responsibility.