Duty of Care in Legal Cases

Duty of Care in Legal Cases

12th Grade

6 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Legal Cases Involving psychiatric injury 1

Legal Cases Involving psychiatric injury 1

12th Grade

5 Qs

Sea soldier nadine chandrawinata

Sea soldier nadine chandrawinata

12th Grade

8 Qs

Caracterul clasa X

Caracterul clasa X

9th - 12th Grade

6 Qs

Exploring the Life of Marie Curie

Exploring the Life of Marie Curie

12th Grade

8 Qs

gr8 nov

gr8 nov

9th - 12th Grade

11 Qs

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 - key liability cases

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 - key liability cases

12th Grade

9 Qs

negligence breach of duty  Quiz

negligence breach of duty Quiz

12th Grade

7 Qs

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

9th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Duty of Care in Legal Cases

Duty of Care in Legal Cases

Assessment

Quiz

Others

12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Christine Hill

FREE Resource

6 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which case established the 'Neighbour principle' in the context of duty of care?

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

Caparo v Dickman (1990)

McLoughlin v O'Brian (1982)

Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1990)

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the three-part tests established in Caparo v Dickman (1990) for duty of care?

Injury or damage must be reasonably foreseeable, proximity of relationship, fair just and reasonable to owe a duty

Proximity of relationship, duty of care, breach of duty

Reasonably foreseeable, breach of duty, causation

Duty of care, breach of duty, damages

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In which case did the court rule that it was not fair, just, or reasonable for the police to owe a duty of care to a member of the public not known to them?

Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1990)

McLoughlin v O'Brian (1982)

Kent v Griffiths (2000)

Bourhill v Young (1943)

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the case of McLoughlin v O'Brian (1982), what was the reason for the duty of care owed?

Mother suffered shock when saw injured family in hospital

Woman had accident and suffered shock when saw blood on road

Ambulance took unreasonable time to arrive

Injury or damage must be reasonably foreseeable

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the judgment in the case of Kent v Griffiths (2000)?

Ambulance took unreasonable time to arrive and take patient to hospital

Woman had accident and suffered shock when saw blood on road

Mother suffered shock when saw injured family in hospital

Not fair, just or reasonable for police to owe a duty to member of public not known to them

6.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What is the legal significance of the case Robinson V the chief constable of West Yorkshire police (2018)?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

This case established that the police do duty of care to the general public but more significantly ruled that the Caparo test need only be applied in novel, where there is no analogist case.