1. According to Richard Dawkins, why do bad things happen?

• Because of divine punishment

• Because of human error

• Due to natural causes that can be explained by science

• Because of personal sins

1. What is one way Dawkins suggests people often explain bad events?

• Through scientific theories

• By invoking supernatural explanations

• By analyzing statistical data

• By studying psychological impacts

1. How does Dawkins view the role of myths in explaining natural disasters?

• As accurate scientific explanations

• As useful for understanding complex phenomena

• As outdated and not scientifically valid

• As the foundation for modern scientific research

1. According to Dawkins, what does science provide that myths do not?

• Comfort and emotional relief

• Testable and verifiable explanations

• Moral guidance

• Cultural stories and traditions

1. Which of the following is NOT a method Dawkins mentions for explaining why bad things happen?

• Mythological stories

• Scientific research

• Personal anecdotes

• Religious beliefs

1. What does Dawkins argue is the advantage of using scientific explanations over mythical ones?

• Scientific explanations are more entertaining

• Scientific explanations are based on empirical evidence

• Scientific explanations are more traditional

• Scientific explanations are easier to understand

1. In Dawkins' view, what role does mythology play in human understanding of the world?

• It provides accurate descriptions of natural laws

• It serves as a way to cope with uncertainties but lacks empirical support

• It is a scientific tool for discovering new facts

• It is used primarily for educational purposes in modern science

1. How does Dawkins suggest we should approach understanding natural phenomena?

• By relying on ancient myths

• By seeking explanations that can be tested and validated

• By following religious doctrines

• By adhering to personal beliefs and opinions

1. What is Dawkins' perspective on the relationship between science and religion in explaining disasters?

• Science and religion are equally valid methods of explanation

• Science offers a better explanation based on evidence, while religion provides comfort

• Religion is the only true method of explanation

• Science and religion are irrelevant to understanding disasters

1. According to Dawkins, how does the scientific method contribute to our understanding of bad events?

• By providing emotional support

• By offering predictive models based on data

• By reinforcing religious beliefs

• By dismissing historical accounts