
Torts 2 Week 9
Authored by Ella Burton
Other
University
Used 2+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
16 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
The medical practitioner/patient relationship is a recognised category of duty
True
False
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
What is involved in the medical practitioner/patient duty?
The relevant duty of care is to exercise reasonable care and skill in respect of examination, diagnosis and treatment of the patient
The relevant duty of care is to exercise reasonable care and skill in respect of examination, diagnosis and treatment of the patient and in the provision of information
3.
MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
What is a material risk?
A reasonable person in the plaintiff's position, if warned of risk, would be likely to attach significance to it
A reasonable person in the plaintiff's position, if warned of risk, wouldn't be likely to attach significance to it
If the patient is or should reasonably be aware that the particular medical practitioner, if warned of the risk, would be likely to attach significance to it
If the medical practitioner is or should reasonably be aware that the particular patient, if warned of the risk, would be likely to attach significance to it
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
The court said in Chappel v Hart, the Dr should have known from her questions that she would attach significance to the risk and thus it was material under the...
Chappel test
Lown test
Hargrave test
Rogers test
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Failing to warn a patient is under what section of the CLA?
s 22
s 9
s 10
s 21
6.
MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
What are some areas where proving causation in medical negligence is an issue?
Evidential difficulties
Failure to warn
Loss of chance
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
Where the defendant's negligence consists of a failure to warn the plaintiff, the plaintiff must establish on the balance of probabilities that they would have responded to warning in such a way as to avoid the danger. Which case is this from?
Chappel v Hart
Rogers v Whitaker
Rosenberg v Percival
Neal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?