Search Header Logo

Torts 2 Week 9

Authored by Ella Burton

Other

University

Used 2+ times

Torts 2 Week 9
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

16 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The medical practitioner/patient relationship is a recognised category of duty

True

False

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What is involved in the medical practitioner/patient duty?

The relevant duty of care is to exercise reasonable care and skill in respect of examination, diagnosis and treatment of the patient

The relevant duty of care is to exercise reasonable care and skill in respect of examination, diagnosis and treatment of the patient and in the provision of information

3.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

What is a material risk?

A reasonable person in the plaintiff's position, if warned of risk, would be likely to attach significance to it

A reasonable person in the plaintiff's position, if warned of risk, wouldn't be likely to attach significance to it

If the patient is or should reasonably be aware that the particular medical practitioner, if warned of the risk, would be likely to attach significance to it

If the medical practitioner is or should reasonably be aware that the particular patient, if warned of the risk, would be likely to attach significance to it

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

The court said in Chappel v Hart, the Dr should have known from her questions that she would attach significance to the risk and thus it was material under the...

Chappel test

Lown test

Hargrave test

Rogers test

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Failing to warn a patient is under what section of the CLA?

s 22

s 9

s 10

s 21

6.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What are some areas where proving causation in medical negligence is an issue?

Evidential difficulties

Failure to warn

Loss of chance

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Where the defendant's negligence consists of a failure to warn the plaintiff, the plaintiff must establish on the balance of probabilities that they would have responded to warning in such a way as to avoid the danger. Which case is this from?

Chappel v Hart

Rogers v Whitaker

Rosenberg v Percival

Neal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?