Lesson 5:  from Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion/Dissent QUIZ

Lesson 5: from Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion/Dissent QUIZ

10th Grade

15 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Flags

Flags

KG - Professional Development

15 Qs

Unit 1 - Lesson 4

Unit 1 - Lesson 4

10th Grade

10 Qs

Figures of Speech

Figures of Speech

9th - 10th Grade

20 Qs

Soul Surfer (Clip 3)

Soul Surfer (Clip 3)

6th Grade - University

18 Qs

Figurative Language

Figurative Language

6th - 10th Grade

17 Qs

Recount Text

Recount Text

9th Grade - University

10 Qs

The Flag We Love

The Flag We Love

2nd Grade - University

15 Qs

Poetry Terms

Poetry Terms

8th - 10th Grade

15 Qs

Lesson 5:  from Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion/Dissent QUIZ

Lesson 5: from Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion/Dissent QUIZ

Assessment

Quiz

English

10th Grade

Medium

CCSS
RI.8.1, RI. 9-10.2, RI.11-12.7

+12

Standards-aligned

Created by

Damar Dubon

Used 19+ times

FREE Resource

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which constitutional right was at the center of the Texas v. Johnson case?

  • A. Second Amendment (Right to Bear Arms)

  • B. Fourth Amendment (Protection from Unreasonable Searches)

  • C. First Amendment (Freedom of Speech)

  • D. Fifth Amendment (Right to Due Process)

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the majority in Texas v. Johnson conclude about flag burning?

  • A. It is a form of unprotected speech.

  • B. It is a form of protected symbolic speech.

  • C. It can be banned by the government.

  • D. It does not qualify as speech under the First Amendment.

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.7

CCSS.RI.8.7

CCSS.RI.9-10.7

CCSS.RL.11-12.7

CCSS.RL.9-10.7

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the majority, what was the main reason Texas' law against flag burning was unconstitutional?

  • A. The law banned symbolic speech based on its content.

  • B. The law did not have public support.

  • C. Flag burning was not considered expressive conduct.

  • D. The law only applied to certain types of speech.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What key argument did the dissent make in defense of Texas' law?

  • A. The flag should be protected because it is a sacred symbol.

  • B. Flag burning is an ineffective form of protest.

  • C. Free speech does not apply to acts that offend others.

  • D. Flag desecration causes public disorder.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the dissent’s view, why should the government be allowed to ban flag burning?

  • A. It does not convey any important political messages.

  • B. It disrespects a key national symbol, undermining national unity.

  • C. It incites violence.

  • D. It goes against public morals.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which justice wrote the majority opinion in Texas v. Johnson?

  • A. Chief Justice Rehnquist

  • B. Justice Stevens

  • C. Justice Brennan

  • D. Justice O'Connor

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the key point of disagreement between the majority and the dissent?

  • A. Whether flag burning is effective protest.

  • B. Whether flag burning should be allowed as political expression.

  • C. Whether the First Amendment should protect all forms of speech.

  • D. Whether Texas should punish people for anti-American sentiment.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?