Search Header Logo

Quiz on Economic and Cultural Determinants of Democracy

Authored by Katerina Rigas

Social Studies

University

Used 2+ times

Quiz on Economic and Cultural Determinants of Democracy
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What form (what type of categorical syllogism) does the following argument take?

Major premise: If Protestantism is antithetical to democracy, then Protestant-majority countries are more likely to be dictatorships than democracies.

Minor premise: Most Protestant-majority countries around the world today are democracies.

Conclusion: Therefore, Protestantism is compatible with democracy.

Affirming the antecedent

Denying the antecedent

Affirming the consequent

Denying the consequent

Answer explanation

Media Image

This is an example of denying the consequent If P, then Q;

Not Q,

Therefore, not P

The major premise states, "If Protestantism is antithetical to democracy, then Protestant-majority countries are more likely to be dictatorships."

The minor premise denies the consequent by stating that Protestant-majority countries today are democracies.

Thus, the conclusion follows that Protestantism is not antithetical to democracy.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What does the Ultimatum Game suggest about the importance of social preferences in decision-making?

People are solely motivated by monetary gain.

Social preferences, such as fairness and reciprocity, play a significant role in decision-making.

Social preferences are irrelevant when it comes to monetary offers.

People prioritize speed over fairness in decision-making.

Answer explanation

Media Image

The Ultimatum Game reveals that people often reject unfair offers, even at a cost to themselves.

This suggests that fairness and social preferences are more important than maximizing personal monetary gain

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Consider the following: "If citizens have mobile assets, then the government will not predate on them." What is the independent variable?

Mobile assets

Government predation

Loyalty

Answer explanation

Media Image

The independent variable is the factor that influences the outcome.

In this case, the presence of mobile assets is the condition that affects whether the government will engage in predation.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

According to the implications of the Exit, Voice, and Loyalty game, we should expect that countries in which the state controls high levels of natural resources are more likely to be democratic than countries in which the state does not control high levels of natural resources?

True

False

Answer explanation

According to the EVL game, countries with high natural resources are less likely to be democratic because the state does not depend on citizens for revenue.

Consequently, the state does not need to respond to their demands, often leading to autocratic governance.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

"Economic growth increases government stability." What is the dependent variable?

Economic growth

Government stability.

Answer explanation

The dependent variable is the outcome affected by the independent variable.

In this case, government stability is influenced by economic growth.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

A great deal of empirical evidence indicates that there is a strong association between income and democracy. This is what would be predicted by:

Modernization theory

The survival story

Both modernization theory and the survival story

Neither; this evidence disproves implications from both theories.

Answer explanation

  • Both modernization theory and the survival story predict a positive relationship between higher income and democracy.

  • Modernization theory posits that higher income leads to the emergence and survival of democracies.

  • The survival story predicts higher income increases democratic survival, but does not make any claims about the

    emergence of democracy.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

What did Putnam find in his study of Italy regarding social capital?

Social capital was higher in southern Italy compared to northern Italy.

Regions with higher levels of social capital had better governmental performance.

Social capital had no effect on the performance of regional governments.

Social capital was only present in rural areas of Italy.

Answer explanation

Media Image

Putnam’s (1993) study found that areas with higher levels of social capital (networks of trust, norms of reciprocity, civic engagement) also had more effective governance.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Microsoft

Continue with Microsoft

or continue with

Facebook

Facebook

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?