Moot Court 2024 Case Law Quiz

Moot Court 2024 Case Law Quiz

10th Grade

15 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Ewangelia według św. Marka

Ewangelia według św. Marka

9th - 11th Grade

17 Qs

big brain minecraft

big brain minecraft

KG - Professional Development

16 Qs

Transportation - Goblaisation (Moral Education)

Transportation - Goblaisation (Moral Education)

7th - 10th Grade

15 Qs

Unemployment in India

Unemployment in India

8th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

OTC TOWM CH 3 Vocab

OTC TOWM CH 3 Vocab

9th - 11th Grade

15 Qs

Lets have Fun

Lets have Fun

1st - 10th Grade

15 Qs

TEMA: PEMULIHARAAN ALAM

TEMA: PEMULIHARAAN ALAM

1st - 12th Grade

20 Qs

PH DINAMIKA KELAHIRAN PANCASILA KELAS X

PH DINAMIKA KELAHIRAN PANCASILA KELAS X

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Moot Court 2024 Case Law Quiz

Moot Court 2024 Case Law Quiz

Assessment

Quiz

Moral Science

10th Grade

Easy

Created by

Madelyn Brunner

Used 6+ times

FREE Resource

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Pickering v. BoE (1968), what was the main reason the court ruled in favor of Pickering?

The teacher's speech was disruptive.

The teacher's interest in public concern outweighed government efficiency.


The teacher was not a public employee.


The teacher was not a public employee.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of Connick v. Myers (1983)?


Connick won.


Myers won.

The case was dismissed.

The court ruled in favor of Myers.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Rankin v. Mcpherson (1987), why was Mcpherson's speech protected?


It was not a matter of public concern.


It was deemed disruptive.


It was on a matter of public concern and not disruptive.

It was a private conversation.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the court's decision in Urofsky v. Gilmore (2000)?


Urofsky won.


The case was undecided.

Gilmore won.


The professors won.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who was involved in the Connick v. Myers (1983) case?


A public school teacher


A group of professors


A district attorney


A college professor

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main issue in Connick v. Myers (1983)?


A letter on financial allocation

A comment about Ronald Reagan


A survey distributed to employees


A pamphlet criticizing policy

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did the court rule in favor of Gilmore in Urofsky v. Gilmore (2000)?


The state had the right to control its resources.


The professors were public employees.


The professors had the same rights as citizens.


The material was not explicit.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?