National Security and Interrogation Techniques

National Security and Interrogation Techniques

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Professional Development, Moral Science

10th - 12th Grade

Medium

Created by

Mia Campbell

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

The speaker discusses the challenges of being a woman in national security, critiquing the notion that aggression equates to effective policy. They emphasize the importance of maintaining composure in leadership roles and argue against the use of extreme interrogation tactics, which have proven ineffective. The speaker warns against the myth that toughness can ensure complete safety from terrorism, highlighting that violence occurs globally regardless of a country's policies. They advocate for a balanced approach to risk management and policy-making.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest is not a valid policy in national security meetings?

Being more informed

Being more aggressive

Being more collaborative

Being more diplomatic

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the speaker, what is a key quality for a president when things go wrong?

Being aggressive

Being indecisive

Avoiding responsibility

Staying calm

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker say about the effectiveness of torture in interrogation?

It is a necessary evil

It is ineffective and problematic

It provides reliable information

It is highly effective

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a consequence of using extreme interrogation tactics, according to the speaker?

Faster resolution of cases

Increased international respect

More accurate intelligence

Legal and ethical issues

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest is a more effective interrogation technique?

Using physical force

Building rapport

Threatening the detainee

Isolating the detainee

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker warn against regarding counter-terrorism policies?

Believing they can ensure 100% safety

Implementing them too quickly

Making them too lenient

Ignoring them completely

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which countries does the speaker mention as examples of those experiencing political violence?

Brazil and Argentina

Israel and China

Sweden and Norway

Canada and Mexico

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?