Graffiti: Art or Pollution Quiz

What is the author’s position in the article "Graffiti: Art or Pollution?"

• Graffiti should be criminalized as it defaces public property.

• Graffiti is a form of art that should be embraced rather than condemned.

• Graffiti is not art but a form of pollution.

• Graffiti is acceptable only if it is confined to private spaces.

Which reason does the author use to support the claim that graffiti is art?

• Graffiti artists only use legal spaces for their work.

• Graffiti reflects self-expression and the urban experience.

• Graffiti has been proven to reduce crime in cities.

• Graffiti is always created to beautify public spaces.

How does the author address the counterargument that graffiti defaces public property?

• By agreeing with city planners and law enforcement.

• By suggesting designated spaces for graffiti.

• By denying that graffiti damages public property.

• By focusing only on graffiti created on private property.

What type of logical reasoning does the author use to argue that graffiti can raise awareness about social issues?

• Emotional reasoning based on personal stories.

• Cause-and-effect reasoning linking graffiti to social activism.

• Analogy comparing graffiti to classical art forms.

• Deductive reasoning based on historical facts.

What is the purpose of the section titled "Art: Says Who?"

• To explain the legal penalties for graffiti.

• To emphasize that the definition of art is subjective and personal.

• To highlight examples of classical and traditional art.

• To argue that graffiti is universally considered art.

Which claim does the author make about incorporating graffiti into city plans?

• It would prevent graffiti from spreading to suburban areas.

• It could improve urban spaces and attract tourists.

• It would eliminate the need for graffiti entirely.

• It would ensure that graffiti artists are paid for their work.

What is the central message of the article?

• Graffiti should be decriminalized and recognized as a legitimate form of art.

• Graffiti is only acceptable in specific, legal areas.

• Graffiti artists should work on canvases instead of public walls.

• Graffiti reflects urban problems and should be banned.

What is the author's purpose in writing this article?

• To inform readers about the history of graffiti.

• To persuade readers to see graffiti as a valid form of art.

• To entertain readers with stories about graffiti artists.

• To argue that graffiti should remain illegal.

Which evidence does the author provide to support the idea that graffiti is cultural?

• Graffiti is rooted in hip-hop culture and reflects the urban, inner-city experience.

• Graffiti artists only work in specific neighborhoods.

• Graffiti originated as a form of rebellion in ancient times.

• Graffiti is often created by professional artists trained in classical techniques.

How does the author suggest graffiti can be beneficial to society?

• By reducing vandalism in suburban areas.

• By beautifying urban areas and promoting economic growth.

• By replacing other forms of street advertising.

• By eliminating social tensions in cities.