AP Statistics Inference Slope

AP Statistics Inference Slope

11th - 12th Grade

13 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

AP Stats Inference

AP Stats Inference

12th Grade - University

10 Qs

AP Statistics - Review #2 MCQ

AP Statistics - Review #2 MCQ

9th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

AP Stats Unit 2 Review

AP Stats Unit 2 Review

12th Grade

17 Qs

VCE Further Maths Ch5 Transformations Review

VCE Further Maths Ch5 Transformations Review

11th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

AP Statistics Estimating Slope

AP Statistics Estimating Slope

11th - 12th Grade

13 Qs

Linear Regression Inference and Transformations Review

Linear Regression Inference and Transformations Review

11th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Inference for Slope

Inference for Slope

12th Grade

11 Qs

Minitab Statistics

Minitab Statistics

12th Grade - University

18 Qs

AP Statistics Inference Slope

AP Statistics Inference Slope

Assessment

Quiz

Mathematics

11th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Barbara White

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

13 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Which of the following is NOT one of the conditions that must be satisfied in order to perform inference about the slope of a least-squares regression line?

For each value of x, the population of y-values is Normally distributed.

The standard deviation ó of the population of y-values corresponding to a particular value of x is always the same, regardless of the specific value of x.

 The sample size—that is, the number of paired observations (xy)—exceeds 30

 The data come from a random sample or a randomized experiment.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Inference about the slope β of a least-squares regression line is based on which of the following distributions?

The t distribution with n – 1 degrees of freedom

The standard Normal distribution

The Chi-square distribution with n – 1 degrees of freedom

The t distribution with n – 2 degrees of freedom

The Normal distribution with mean µ and standard deviation ó

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

Old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded. A least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. The following results were obtained from statistical software.


The correlation between total winnings and average number of putts per hole for these players is

-0.285

-0.081

-0.007

0.081

0.285

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

Old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded. A least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. The following results were obtained from statistical software.


Suppose that the researchers test the hypothesis H0: β=0, Ha: β<0. The value of the t statistic for the test is

2.61

2.44

0.081

-2.44

-20.24

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

Old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded. A least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. The following results were obtained from statistical software.


The p-value for the test is 0.0087. A correct interpretation for this result is that

the probability that there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for these 69 players is 0.0087.

the probability there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for all players on the PGA Tour’s world money list is 0.0087.

if there is a linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players in the sample, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players that yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of -4139198 or less is 0.0087.

if there is no linear relationship between the number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players on the PGA Tours world money list, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players that yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of -4139198 or less is 0.0087.

the probability of making a Type II error is 0.0087.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

Old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded. A least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. The following results were obtained from statistical software.


A 95% confidence interval for the slope β of the population regression line is

7,897,179 + 3,023,782

7,897,179 + 6,047,564

-4,139,198 + 1,698,371

-4,139,198 + 3,328,807

-4,139,198 + 3,396,742

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

15 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

Old saying in golf is “You drive for show and you putt for dough.” The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour’s world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole and the player’s total winnings for the previous season are recorded. A least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. The following results were obtained from statistical software.


A residual plot from the least-squares regression is shown. Which of the following statements is supported by the graph?

The residual plot contains dramatic evidence that the standard deviation of the response about the population regression line increases as the average number of putts per round increases.

The sum of the residuals is not 0. Obviously, there is a major error present.

Using the regression line to predict a player’s total winnings from his average number of putts almost always results in errors of less than $200,000.

For two players, the regression line under-predicts their total winnings by more than $800,000.

The residual plot reveals a strong positive correlation between average putts per round and prediction errors from the least-squares line for these eleven years.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?