Court delays ruling on Brexit extension letter until after October 19

The transcript discusses the court's undertakings regarding the Bane Act, emphasizing the Prime Minister's obligation to comply. It highlights the potential consequences of non-compliance, likening it to a 'sword of Damocles' over the Prime Minister. The session concludes with the Prime Minister's confirmation to abide by the Bane Act, marking a significant shift from previous refusals, and the petitioners feel vindicated.

What was the Prime Minister expected to do according to the court's undertakings?

• Challenge the court's decision

• Seek to frustrate the Bane Act

• Abide by the Bane Act

• Ignore the Bane Act

What is the significance of the 21st in the context of the Bane Act?

• It is the date for a new court hearing

• It is the deadline for the Prime Minister to comply with the Act

• It marks the end of the court's jurisdiction

• It is the day the Bane Act was passed

What might happen if the Prime Minister does not comply with the Bane Act by the 21st?

• The Prime Minister will be exempt from the Act

• The court will dismiss the case

• The court may have to reconvene

• The matter will be considered resolved

How did the petitioners feel about the outcome of the court proceedings?

• Confused

• Indifferent

• Vindicated

• Disappointed

What was the Prime Minister's previous stance on the Bane Act before the court proceedings?

• He had never heard of it

• He was indifferent to it

• He had refused to abide by it

• He had always supported it