Making Science Policy

The video discusses the role and effectiveness of bioethics advisory panels, focusing on the UK's Nuffield Council on Bioethics and its model of providing independent ethics advice to various government bodies. It highlights the potential political influence on such panels and compares it to the Bioethics Commission's role in the US, emphasizing the importance of maintaining independence in decision-making processes to ensure unbiased outcomes.

What is the primary role of the UK's Nuffield Council on Bioethics?

• To provide independent ethics advisory opinions

• To legislate bioethical issues

• To fund bioethical research

• To enforce bioethical laws

What is a potential downside of having an independent advisory body?

• It may not be trusted by the public

• It might not have any political effect

• It may lack expertise

• It could be too influential

How might a trusted set of advisors influence decision-making differently than an independent body?

• They may provide less reliable advice

• They could lead to more informed choices

• They might be ignored more often

• They might not be as knowledgeable

What is one of the goals of the Bioethics Commission?

• To replace the Nuffield Council

• To control public opinion

• To inform the public and advance dialogue

• To enforce ethical standards

Why is independence important for advisory commissions?

• To maintain unbiased decision-making

• To increase their political power

• To ensure they are influenced by the president

• To align with government policies