Search Header Logo

Landmark Supreme Court Cases- 3.12

Authored by Wayground Content

Social Studies

7th Grade

Used 36+ times

Landmark Supreme Court Cases- 3.12
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

17 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled that racial segregation did not violate right to “equal protection,” (14th Amendment). Facilities provided to each were “separate but equal.” Segregation strengthened across south.

Brown v. Board of Education
Plessy v. Ferguson 
Gideon v. Wainwright 
In Re Gault 

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

 3.12 The case established the Court’s power of judicial review.  The Court had the duty of interpreting the law. If the court identifies a law in conflict with the Constitution, the law is invalid.

Marbury V. Madison
Tinker v. Des Moines 
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Miranda v. Arizona 

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

What is the significance of the landmark Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

As a result, segregation was found to be unconstitutional.

As a result, the civil war ended.

As a result, racist segregation laws were further strengthened across the South by justifying "separate but equal" was constitutional.

As a result, people stopped using train cars altogether.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

 3.12 Halted the recount in the 2000 Presidential Election. As a result of this decision, Bush won the Presidential election.

Bush v. Gore 
United States v. Nixon

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

Media Image

What is the significance of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803)

The case established that students had free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment

The case established citizenship rights

The case established the Court’s power of judicial review.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled that juvenile courts should have different procedures, but due process rights still apply to children.

In Re Gault 
Miranda v. Arizona 
Gideon v. Wainwright 
Tinker v. Des Moines

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

5 mins • 1 pt

 3.12 Ruled that “executive privilege” did not justify withholding evidence in a criminal investigation. President is not above the rule of law.

United States v. Nixon
Bush v. Gore 

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?