EOC Practice

EOC Practice

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Constitution Vocabulary Review

Constitution Vocabulary Review

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Unit 4 Ohio State Gov't

Unit 4 Ohio State Gov't

10th Grade

21 Qs

Articles v. Constitution

Articles v. Constitution

11th Grade

15 Qs

USG.2 Part 2 Quiz

USG.2 Part 2 Quiz

9th - 12th Grade

18 Qs

North Carolina State Convention Quiz

North Carolina State Convention Quiz

8th Grade - University

15 Qs

Constitution Day Quiz

Constitution Day Quiz

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

New Unit 4 Test Review

New Unit 4 Test Review

7th Grade - University

15 Qs

Federalist/Anti-Federalist

Federalist/Anti-Federalist

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

EOC Practice

EOC Practice

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Wayground Content

Used 36+ times

FREE Resource

20 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In 1876, Congress passed a law that stated that post office employees “shall be appointed and may be removed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and shall hold their offices for four years unless sooner removed or suspended according to law.” In the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, the law was ruled unconstitutional. The Supreme Court found that the president has exclusive power to remove officials from the executive branch.How did the Supreme Court’s decision in Myers v. United States impact the constitutional principle of separation of powers?

It clarified the power of the presidency relative to the Senate

It increased the power of the Senate relative to the presidency

It decreased the power of the Supreme Court relative to the Senate

It clarified the power of the Supreme Court relative to the presidency

Answer explanation

The Supreme Court's decision in Myers v. United States clarified that the president has the exclusive power to remove executive officials, reinforcing the separation of powers by limiting Senate influence over executive appointments.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Bill of Rights was adopted to address Anti-Federalist concerns about the U.S. Constitution. One of the amendments from the Bill of Rights is shown.In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed...What was an Anti-Federalist concern about the U.S. Constitution that was addressed by this amendment?

The U.S. Constitution would reduce the power of the federal government

The U.S. Constitution would produce state courts that were more powerful than federal courts

The U.S. Constitution failed to give sufficient powers to the executive branch

The U.S. Constitution failed to adequately protect the civil liberties of individuals

Answer explanation

The amendment ensures the right to a speedy and public trial, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns that the U.S. Constitution did not adequately protect individual civil liberties, which they feared could be compromised.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which power can the U.S. Supreme Court exercise with reference to the U.S. Constitution?

Provide clarification and/or extend the meaning of constitutional provisions on a case-by-case basis

Formally add new constitutional language by rendering decisions, interpretations and rulings on a case-by-case basis

Propose, alter, approve, and craft constitutional amendments

Veto proposed constitutional amendments before they are ratified

Answer explanation

The U.S. Supreme Court can provide clarification and extend the meaning of constitutional provisions through its interpretations in specific cases, ensuring the Constitution is applied to contemporary issues.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How was the U.S. Constitution amended to expand participation in federal elections to the District of Columbia?

By lowering the voting age in the District of Columbia to 21

By allowing residents of the District of Columbia to elect a mayor

By granting the District of Columbia representation in the U.S. Senate

By giving the District of Columbia representation in the Electoral College

Answer explanation

The U.S. Constitution was amended to give the District of Columbia representation in the Electoral College, allowing its residents to participate in federal elections, unlike the other options listed.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

An excerpt from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is shownNo person acting under color of law shall…in determining whether any individual is qualified under State law or laws to vote in any Federal election, apply any standard, practice, or procedure different from the standards, practices, or procedures applied under such law or laws to other individuals within the same country, parish, or similar political subdivision who have been found by State officials to be qualified to vote…Civil Rights Act, July 2, 1964Which basic principle of the U.S. Constitution was reinforced as a result of this act?

Popular Sovereignty

Separation of Church and State

Checks and Balances

Separation of Powers

Answer explanation

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 reinforced the principle of Separation of Powers by ensuring that state laws regarding voting qualifications are applied equally, preventing discrimination and upholding individual rights.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How were voting qualifications for national elections changed by a constitutional amendment?

By lowering the minimum age to vote

By adding a poll tax requirement prior to voting

By making citizens over a specific age pass a test to vote

By limiting general election voting to those who voted in the primary elections

Answer explanation

The constitutional amendment lowered the minimum age to vote, expanding access to national elections. This change allowed younger citizens to participate, contrasting with other options that imposed restrictions.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The government has enacted a law requiring the installation of seat belts in new cars. What is the intended benefit of this type of increased government regulation?

to increase tax revenue

to enhance consumer protections

to promote economic growth

to reduce private-sector profits

Answer explanation

The intended benefit of requiring seat belts in new cars is to enhance consumer protections by improving safety and reducing injuries in accidents, thereby prioritizing public health over other economic factors.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?