Search Header Logo

Civil Code - Oblicon

Authored by Wayground Content

Design

University

Civil Code - Oblicon
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

6 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Can Joshua demand payment from Julia?

Yes, because he completed the work as agreed.

No, because contracts over ₱500,000 must be in writing to be enforceable.

Yes, Julia is obligated to pay for the services rendered.

No, because verbal agreements are always valid.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Can Lola Carmen have the contract annulled?

Yes, because she was misled about the costs.

No, because she signed the contract willingly.

Yes, due to her age and poor eyesight.

No, because contracts cannot be annulled after signing.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this contract valid?

Yes, the contract is valid as the designer agreed to do the work.

No, the contract is valid but cannot be enforced due to building regulations.

No, under Article 1348, contracts with an impossible object are void.

Yes, the contract is valid as long as the designer can find a workaround.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Can Mr. Cruz file a case against Maria for breach of contract?

No, because Maria completed part of the work.

Yes, because Maria failed to fulfill her obligation under the contract.

No, because Mr. Cruz did not pay the full amount.

Yes, but only if Mr. Cruz can prove damages.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Can Kathy demand compensation?

No, because Lance can terminate the contract at any time.

Yes, because contracts can be revoked by one party without consequences.

Yes, because Kathy can claim payment for completed work and damages for lost profits.

No, because Kathy did not complete the project.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Can Anna take legal action against Joel?

No, because the contract does not specify the material quality.

Yes, this constitutes fraud under Article 1338, where one party induces another into entering a contract through deceit.

No, because Anna did not specify the material in the contract.

Yes, but only if she can prove that Joel intended to deceive her.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?