Irreducible Complexity and Intelligent Design

Irreducible Complexity and Intelligent Design

Assessment

Interactive Video

Biology

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Jackson Turner

FREE Resource

The video critiques Michael Behe's concept of irreducible complexity, highlighting its flaws and the lack of scientific support. It discusses Behe's role in the Discovery Institute and his involvement in the Kitzmiller v. Dover case. The video also analyzes Behe's books, pointing out errors and misrepresentations in his arguments against evolution.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main argument of Michael Behe's concept of irreducible complexity?

Some biological systems are too complex to have evolved through natural selection.

All biological systems are simple and can evolve easily.

Biological systems can evolve through gradual modifications.

Biological systems are designed by humans.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which experiment provided evidence against the concept of irreducible complexity?

Mendel's Pea Plant Experiment

Darwin's Finches Study

The Miller-Urey Experiment

The Lenski Long Term Evolution Experiment

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common tactic used by proponents of intelligent design to argue against evolution?

Using scientific data

Promoting genetic drift

Supporting Darwinian evolution

Ignoring existing research

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do proponents of intelligent design often misrepresent biological systems?

By comparing them to natural phenomena

By comparing them to man-made machines

By claiming they are simple

By ignoring their complexity

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main criticism of Behe's use of analogies in intelligent design?

They inaccurately compare biological systems to machines.

They are too complex.

They are not relatable.

They are too simple.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major flaw in Behe's argument in 'The Edge of Evolution'?

He ignores the role of recombination in evolution.

He uses too many examples.

He focuses only on plant evolution.

He supports Darwinian evolution.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the 'two-binding-sites rule' proposed by Behe?

A rule that supports Darwinian evolution.

A rule that states two new protein-protein binding sites cannot evolve.

A rule that explains the evolution of all proteins.

A rule that describes the simplicity of biological systems.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?