
Psychological explanations for offending - AQA Psychology
Authored by George Montagnon-Fox
Social Studies
12th Grade

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
13 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
A student is given a scenario: "An individual has a high extraversion score and a high neuroticism score." Based on Eysenck’s theory, what might this suggest about the individual’s likelihood of engaging in offending behavior?
They are less likely to engage in offending behavior due to high stability.
They are more likely to engage in offending behavior due to seeking excitement and being more reactive.
They are unlikely to be influenced by their personality traits.
They are more likely to avoid social situations.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What did Eysenck and Eysenck (1970) find in their study of male offenders regarding the relationship between personality traits and criminality?
High scores for psychoticism and neuroticism, but not for extraversion, were found
High scores for extraversion only were found
No relationship between any personality traits and criminality was found
Only neuroticism was linked to criminality
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to Kohlberg's theory, at what age is moral reasoning usually considered complete, aligning with the age of criminal responsibility in the UK?
5 or 6 years old
9 or 10 years old
13 or 14 years old
16 or 17 years old
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Rosen (1980) criticized the use of the Heinz dilemma in Kohlberg’s research for which main reason?
The dilemma was too easy for participants
The scenario lacked validity as children could not relate to it from their own perspective
The dilemma was not ethical to present to children
The scenario was too short and simple
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
How did the study by Copello and Tata (1980) contribute to our understanding of hostile attribution bias?
It showed that all people interpret ambiguous sentences as hostile
It found that adult male violent offenders were more likely to interpret ambiguous sentences as hostile compared to non-offenders
It proved that hostile attribution bias does not exist
It showed that non-offenders are more hostile than offenders
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to Kennedy and Grubin (1992), what did the majority of convicted sex offenders tend to do regarding their crimes?
Accept full responsibility for their actions
Blame the victim
Deny the crime occurred
Blame law enforcement
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Evaluate one strength of Sutherland’s differential association theory as discussed in the material.
It only applies to violent crimes
It explains how different types of crimes, including “white collar crimes,” can be understood through learned associations
It ignores the role of socio-economic status
It assumes all crimes are impulsive
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?