Search Header Logo

Psychological explanations for offending - AQA Psychology

Authored by George Montagnon-Fox

Social Studies

12th Grade

Psychological explanations for offending - AQA Psychology
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

13 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

A student is given a scenario: "An individual has a high extraversion score and a high neuroticism score." Based on Eysenck’s theory, what might this suggest about the individual’s likelihood of engaging in offending behavior?

They are less likely to engage in offending behavior due to high stability.

They are more likely to engage in offending behavior due to seeking excitement and being more reactive.

They are unlikely to be influenced by their personality traits.

They are more likely to avoid social situations.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Eysenck and Eysenck (1970) find in their study of male offenders regarding the relationship between personality traits and criminality?

High scores for psychoticism and neuroticism, but not for extraversion, were found

High scores for extraversion only were found

No relationship between any personality traits and criminality was found

Only neuroticism was linked to criminality

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to Kohlberg's theory, at what age is moral reasoning usually considered complete, aligning with the age of criminal responsibility in the UK?

5 or 6 years old

9 or 10 years old

13 or 14 years old

16 or 17 years old

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Rosen (1980) criticized the use of the Heinz dilemma in Kohlberg’s research for which main reason?

The dilemma was too easy for participants

The scenario lacked validity as children could not relate to it from their own perspective

The dilemma was not ethical to present to children

The scenario was too short and simple

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the study by Copello and Tata (1980) contribute to our understanding of hostile attribution bias?

It showed that all people interpret ambiguous sentences as hostile

It found that adult male violent offenders were more likely to interpret ambiguous sentences as hostile compared to non-offenders

It proved that hostile attribution bias does not exist

It showed that non-offenders are more hostile than offenders

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to Kennedy and Grubin (1992), what did the majority of convicted sex offenders tend to do regarding their crimes?

Accept full responsibility for their actions

Blame the victim

Deny the crime occurred

Blame law enforcement

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Evaluate one strength of Sutherland’s differential association theory as discussed in the material.

It only applies to violent crimes

It explains how different types of crimes, including “white collar crimes,” can be understood through learned associations

It ignores the role of socio-economic status

It assumes all crimes are impulsive

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?