
Action Research Process Worksheet
Authored by Kyriakos Iliou
Business
University
Used 1+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
10 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Strategically plan how you would diagnose the need for change in an organization using the Action Research Process. What evidence would you collect and how would you justify your approach?
Collect data on current organizational performance, employee feedback, and market trends to identify gaps and justify the need for change.
Ask the consultant to guess what needs to be changed based on intuition.
Only rely on financial reports to diagnose the need for change.
Skip the diagnosis and move directly to introducing change.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Analyze the potential risks and benefits of using a Laissez-faire leadership style in a team where employees are highly skilled but lack motivation. What reasoning would you use to decide if this style is appropriate?
The Laissez-faire style would be beneficial because skilled employees always perform well without supervision.
The Laissez-faire style could be risky because lack of motivation may lead to poor decision-making, even if employees are skilled.
The Laissez-faire style is always the best choice for any team, regardless of employee motivation.
The Laissez-faire style should never be used, even if employees are skilled.
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Evaluate how the Democratic leadership style might impact the commitment of team members to a final decision. What evidence or reasoning supports your answer?
Democratic leadership decreases commitment because too many opinions cause confusion.
Democratic leadership increases commitment because participation encourages ownership of the final decision.
Democratic leadership has no effect on commitment since the leader makes all decisions alone.
Democratic leadership discourages communication, leading to less commitment.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Analyze the potential consequences of an autocratic leadership style in a modern workplace. How might the use of rewards and fear of punishment impact employee motivation and organizational culture?
It may foster creativity and open communication among employees.
It could lead to increased employee motivation and a positive culture.
It may result in fear, reduced motivation, and an unprofessional environment.
It encourages collaborative decision-making and shared responsibility.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Analyze how organizational socialization supports the development of organizational culture, and propose a strategy for a new employee to effectively learn and adapt to the culture in a changing organization.
Organizational socialization provides a structured process for new employees to learn the culture, which can be enhanced by mentorship and feedback mechanisms.
Organizational socialization is unrelated to organizational culture and does not affect employee adaptation.
New employees should ignore organizational socialization and focus only on their job tasks.
Organizational culture is only learned through formal training sessions, not through socialization.
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Evaluate the importance of clarity, inspiration, feasibility, and alignment in developing a change vision for an organization. Which component is most critical for ensuring successful change, and why?
Feasibility is most critical because it ensures the vision is achievable within the organization's capabilities and resources.
Inspiration is most critical because it motivates stakeholders regardless of the vision's practicality.
Alignment is most critical because it ignores organizational values and strategic goals.
Clarity is most critical because it only defines what the organization will look like post-change without considering other factors.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Given the definition of a change vision, construct a scenario where an organization fails to achieve its desired future state due to lack of alignment. What could have been done differently?
The organization could have aligned its vision with organizational values and strategic goals to ensure stakeholder support and successful implementation.
The organization should have ignored alignment and focused only on clarity.
The organization could have avoided change altogether.
The organization should have relied solely on inspiration to motivate stakeholders.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?