Expert Witnesses and Jury Deliberation

Expert Witnesses and Jury Deliberation

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Journalism, Business

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Emma Peterson

FREE Resource

David Henderson discusses the defense strategy for Derek Chauvin, emphasizing the importance of showing remorse. The prosecution's expert, Dr. Tobin, effectively rebuts the defense's claims. Closing arguments are expected to be crucial, with the jury yet to deliberate. The outcome remains unpredictable, with both sides needing to present strong arguments. The trial's coverage will continue on CNBC.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was David Henderson's initial advice for Derek Chauvin's defense strategy?

To show remorse and testify

To remain silent

To hire a new lawyer

To plead guilty

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Dr. Tobin need to do during his testimony according to David Henderson?

Avoid answering difficult questions

Discredit the defense's witnesses

Simply get on the stand and drop the mic

Provide new evidence

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the defense's strategy regarding expert witnesses?

To discredit the prosecution's experts

To use experts to create reasonable doubt

To rely on experts who were not familiar with the case

To avoid using any experts

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the role of expert witnesses in the trial?

To serve as jurors

To act as defense attorneys

To introduce new evidence

To provide opinions based on their expertise

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary task of the prosecution during the closing arguments?

To request a mistrial

To discredit the defense's closing arguments

To remind the jury of the video evidence and expert testimony

To introduce new evidence

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the defense's main goal during the closing arguments?

To introduce new evidence

To create reasonable doubt

To request a mistrial

To discredit the prosecution's witnesses

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the challenge for the prosecution in explaining the three charges?

To prove all charges are unrelated

To drop one of the charges

To show how the same conduct can lead to three different charges

To introduce new charges

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?