Conflicts and Resources in Latin America

The video discusses various conflicts in Latin America, focusing on historical and external influences, particularly the role of the US. It highlights specific conflicts such as those between Ecuador and Peru, Chile and Argentina, and Bolivia and Paraguay, emphasizing the economic and strategic motivations behind these disputes.

What are the two main reasons for conflicts in Latin America?

• Historical issues and external influences

• Cultural differences and language barriers

• Climate change and natural disasters

• Technological advancements and industrialization

Which doctrine emphasized 'America for the Americans'?

• Monroe Doctrine

• Marshall Plan

• Truman Doctrine

• Roosevelt Corollary

Which two countries were involved in the 1995 conflict mediated by Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and the US?

• Chile and Bolivia

• Colombia and Venezuela

• Ecuador and Peru

• Argentina and Brazil

What was the main reason behind the Beagle Channel dispute?

• Fishing rights

• Oil reserves

• Territorial control of islands

• Water resources

Which two countries were involved in the Falklands/Malvinas conflict?

• Chile and Argentina

• Brazil and Uruguay

• Argentina and the United Kingdom

• Peru and Ecuador

What was the main economic resource involved in the Bolivia-Paraguay Chaco War?

• Gold

• Oil

• Nitrates

• Timber

Why did Bolivia lose its access to the Pacific Ocean?

• Due to internal political issues

• As a result of the War of the Pacific

• Because of a trade agreement

• Due to a natural disaster

What was the main reason for Brazil's interest in the Acre territory?

• Rubber extraction

• Timber resources

• Gold mining

• Coffee plantations

What was the outcome of the Acre dispute between Brazil and Bolivia?

• Bolivia retained control of Acre

• Brazil purchased Acre from Bolivia

• Acre became an independent state

• The dispute is still unresolved

What was the impact of synthetic rubber on the Acre territory's economy?

• It led to increased deforestation

• It boosted the economy

• It had no impact

• It caused a decline in the rubber market