Dred Scott Decision and Its Impacts

Dred Scott Decision and Its Impacts

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies

9th - 12th Grade

Medium

Created by

Olivia Brooks

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

The video covers the life of Dred Scott, a slave who sued for his freedom after being taken to free territories. His case, Dred Scott v. Sanford, reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that Scott was not a U.S. citizen and thus had no right to sue. This decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, inflaming tensions between the North and South and bolstering the abolitionist movement. Although Scott's freedom was eventually purchased, he died shortly after. The video concludes with a call to subscribe and explore more resources.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Dred Scott's main argument for his freedom?

He was born in a free state.

His master promised him freedom.

He was illegally held in free territories.

He had served in the US Army.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who was John Emerson in relation to Dred Scott?

A fellow slave

A US Army doctor and Scott's owner

A Supreme Court judge

A lawyer representing Scott

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did the Supreme Court claim it lacked jurisdiction in Dred Scott's case?

The case was too old.

The evidence was insufficient.

The case was not filed in the correct court.

Scott was not a citizen of the United States.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the Court use to determine who were considered citizens when the Constitution was adopted?

The Emancipation Proclamation

The Bill of Rights

The Articles of Confederation

Colonial laws and historical legislation

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the significance of the Missouri Compromise in the Dred Scott decision?

It was ignored by the Court.

It was amended to include new states.

It was declared unconstitutional.

It was upheld as constitutional.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the dissenting justices argue regarding black citizenship?

Blacks should be deported.

Blacks were already citizens.

Blacks could become citizens as they could vote in some states.

Blacks could never be citizens.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How many justices agreed with the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case?

Five

Seven

Nine

Three

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?