Understanding Toulmin's Model of Argumentation

Understanding Toulmin's Model of Argumentation

Assessment

Interactive Video

Philosophy, Education, Social Studies

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Olivia Brooks

FREE Resource

The video tutorial introduces Aristotle's proofs and Toulmin's model for analyzing arguments. It explains the six parts of Toulmin's model: claim, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal, and qualifiers. The tutorial emphasizes the importance of the first three elements—claim, data, and warrant—as essential components of a strong argument. It also discusses how backing, rebuttal, and qualifiers can enhance an argument's effectiveness. Real-world examples are provided to illustrate the application of Toulmin's model in everyday communication.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who developed the model for analyzing and presenting arguments discussed in the video?

Aristotle

Tolman

Socrates

Plato

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary purpose of a 'claim' in Toulmin's model?

To summarize the argument

To offer a counterargument

To state what you want others to believe

To provide evidence

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which element acts as the 'glue' connecting data to the claim?

Qualifier

Warrant

Rebuttal

Backing

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the role of 'backing' in an argument?

To conclude the argument

To refute counterarguments

To introduce new claims

To provide additional support for the warrant

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do 'qualifiers' affect an argument?

They introduce new data

They show the certainty of the claim

They provide legal backing

They refute the claim

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the example of a commercial, what is often implied rather than stated?

The rebuttal to counterarguments

The conclusion of the argument

The warrant connecting the data to the claim

The data supporting the claim

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common rebuttal in the example of flag burning?

Flags are not important

Not everyone respects the flag

All flags should be burned

Flag burning is always legal

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?