Understanding Proof by Counter-Example

Understanding Proof by Counter-Example

Assessment

Interactive Video

Mathematics

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Aiden Montgomery

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explains the concept of proof by counter-example, emphasizing that it is not valid to prove a universal statement with just an example. It discusses existential statements, which can be proven with examples, and demonstrates this with the expression n squared minus n plus 41. The tutorial highlights the importance of negating statements correctly and provides a formal proof by counter-example, showing that the statement 'for all integers n, n squared minus n plus 41 is prime' is false by finding a counter-example.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is it generally not acceptable to prove a universal statement with just an example?

Because examples only show a statement is true for specific cases.

Because examples are too complex to understand.

Because examples are only used for existential statements.

Because examples are not valid in mathematics.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What type of statement can be proven by providing an example?

Conditional statements

Biconditional statements

Universal statements

Existential statements

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the negation of the statement 'For all positive integers n, n squared minus n plus 41 is prime'?

There is a positive integer n such that n squared minus n plus 41 is prime.

For all integers n, n squared minus n plus 41 is not prime.

There is a positive integer n such that n squared minus n plus 41 is not prime.

There is no integer n such that n squared minus n plus 41 is not prime.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What happens to the quantifier when negating a statement involving quantifiers?

The quantifier remains the same.

The quantifier is removed.

The quantifier type changes.

The quantifier is doubled.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the logical equivalent of negating 'For every x, P(x) is true'?

There exists an x such that P(x) is true.

For every x, P(x) is false.

There exists an x such that the negation of P(x) is true.

For every x, the negation of P(x) is false.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is it important to be careful when negating statements involving quantifiers?

Because it changes the meaning of the statement.

Because it has no effect on the statement.

Because it makes the statement longer.

Because it simplifies the statement.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the purpose of finding a counter-example in a proof?

To prove a statement is logically equivalent.

To prove a statement is existentially true.

To prove a statement is false.

To prove a statement is universally true.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?