Understanding Political Polarization and Critique Methods

Understanding Political Polarization and Critique Methods

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Philosophy, History

10th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Mia Campbell

FREE Resource

The video discusses the polarization in US politics, particularly the demonization of Trump supporters by the Democratic establishment. It highlights the importance of internal critique over external critique for meaningful dialogue. The speaker uses the Greek debt crisis as an example of applying internal critique to foster understanding and agreement. The video emphasizes listening to and understanding opposing views, especially in the context of political discontent.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main criticisms the speaker has about the Democratic establishment's approach to Trump supporters?

They have been too lenient.

They have demonized them.

They have supported them.

They have ignored them.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the speaker, what is a major consequence of demonizing political opponents?

It encourages cooperation.

It results in polarization.

It fosters understanding.

It leads to more debates.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main difference between internal and external critique?

Internal critique is less effective; external critique is more effective.

Internal critique is based on emotions; external critique is based on logic.

Internal critique is more aggressive; external critique is passive.

Internal critique accepts assumptions; external critique challenges them.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does the speaker believe external critique is not effective?

It is too simplistic.

It is too complex to understand.

It ends conversations abruptly.

It is too time-consuming.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the goal of using internal critique according to the speaker?

To avoid conflict.

To prove others wrong.

To find logical inconsistencies.

To change one's own beliefs.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the context of the Greek debt crisis, what approach did the speaker use to engage in discussions?

Confrontation

Avoidance

Internal critique

External critique

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the speaker's strategy when discussing capitalism with Christine Lagarde?

To accept her views and find inconsistencies.

To agree with her completely.

To criticize capitalism directly.

To avoid discussing capitalism.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?