Understanding Reasonable Doubt

Understanding Reasonable Doubt

Assessment

Interactive Video

Science, Philosophy, Social Studies

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Mia Campbell

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

The video discusses the concept of 'reasonable doubt' in legal contexts, highlighting its importance in courtroom verdicts. It questions the reliability of this standard by proposing a thought experiment with two separate juries. The discussion critiques the phrase, suggesting it may not mean what it implies, as different juries might reach different conclusions based on the same evidence.

Read more

9 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary context in which the term 'reasonable doubt' is used?

Financial auditing

Medical diagnosis

Legal proceedings

Scientific research

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What emotion is commonly felt in the courtroom when a jury returns with a verdict?

Joy

Boredom

Indifference

Suspense

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the presence of doubt in the courtroom suggest about the verdict?

The verdict is always accurate

There is uncertainty about the verdict

The verdict is predetermined

The verdict is irrelevant

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the likelihood of two separate juries reaching the same verdict on the same case?

Low

Moderate

Certain

Very high

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What famous trial is mentioned as an example of jury decision variability?

The Salem Witch Trials

The O.J. Simpson trial

The Nuremberg Trials

The Scopes Monkey Trial

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the purpose of the hypothetical experiment with two juries?

To prove the efficiency of the legal system

To highlight the inconsistency in jury verdicts

To demonstrate the speed of jury decisions

To show the fairness of trials

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest about the phrase 'beyond reasonable doubt'?

It is universally accepted

It is irrelevant

It is often misunderstood

It is always accurate

8.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker imply about having two juries for every trial?

It would be unnecessary

It would ensure fairness

It would speed up the process

It would be a practical solution

9.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's final stance on the phrase 'beyond reasonable doubt'?

It is universally understood

It is irrelevant in modern trials

It is a clear and definitive standard

It is misleading and not always applicable