Understanding Judicial Philosophy and Humility

The speaker expresses skepticism about the existence of a distinct judicial philosophy, viewing it as a metaphor for case outcomes. Emphasizing the importance of humility, the speaker argues that judges should exercise their power judiciously, regardless of their political leanings. The focus should be on humility and the responsible use of authority, rather than setting things right according to personal beliefs.

What does the speaker believe about the concept of judicial philosophy?

• It is a historical concept.

• It is a new legal theory.

• It is a well-defined set of principles.

• It is a metaphor for decision-making outcomes.

What does the speaker suggest is a metaphor for judicial philosophy?

• Judicial appointments.

• Courtroom procedures.

• Decision-making outcomes.

• Legal precedents.

According to the speaker, what is more important than the outcomes a judge reaches?

• The judge's educational background.

• The judge's sense of humility.

• The judge's political affiliation.

• The judge's experience in law.

What concern does the speaker express about power in public life?

• It is frequently misused.

• It is rarely understood.

• It is often ignored.

• It is always beneficial.

What should judges recognize about their authority, according to the speaker?

• It is absolute and unquestionable.

• It is limited and insignificant.

• It is temporary and fleeting.

• It is enormous and should be used judiciously.

How does the speaker view judges who aim to 'set things right'?

• As visionary leaders.

• As cautious decision-makers.

• As having the wrong attitude.

• As necessary reformers.

What is the speaker's advice for those with great power?

• To act with great ambition.

• To exercise great humility.

• To seek great recognition.

• To maintain great secrecy.

What attitude does the speaker believe is the worst for a judge to have?

• A commitment to public service.

• A focus on legal technicalities.

• A belief in setting things right.

• A desire to maintain the status quo.

What is the speaker's final emphasis regarding judicial philosophy?

• It should be politically neutral.

• It should be universally accepted.

• It should be strictly defined.

• It should be exercised with humility.