Understanding the Evolutionary Novelty of Liberalism

Understanding the Evolutionary Novelty of Liberalism

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Philosophy, Moral Science

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Amelia Wright

FREE Resource

The video discusses a study on the evolutionary novelty of liberalism, suggesting that humans are naturally conservative. It argues that more intelligent individuals are likely to adopt liberal views, which are considered evolutionarily novel and unnatural. The study concludes that intelligence correlates with the likelihood of acquiring such preferences.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker conclude about the nature of liberalism?

It is unrelated to intelligence.

It is a natural human trait.

It is evolutionarily novel.

It is a conservative value.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the speaker, why is it unnatural for humans to be liberal?

Humans are naturally inclined to be liberal.

Humans are designed to care for unrelated people.

Humans are naturally conservative.

Humans are naturally indifferent.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker imply about the welfare concerns of liberals?

They are a natural human instinct.

They are limited to close family.

They extend to millions of unrelated people.

They are primarily self-centered.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the relationship between intelligence and acquiring liberal values, according to the speaker?

More intelligent people are more likely to adopt liberal values.

More intelligent people are less likely to be liberal.

Less intelligent people are more likely to be liberal.

Intelligence has no impact on political values.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might more intelligent individuals adopt preferences considered unnatural?

They are less aware of societal norms.

They are more likely to question traditional values.

They are more influenced by peer pressure.

They are less capable of understanding complex ideas.