Bladesmithing Evaluation and Techniques

The judges evaluate the work of four bladesmiths: Rick, Jordan, David, and Karl. Rick faced challenges with his blade, while Jordan showed skill with an integral bolster. David's blade had a defined edge and intentional texture. Karl, despite injuries, submitted a blade but lacked refinement. The judges then make their final decision.

What challenge did Rick face while working on his blade?

• He couldn't find the right steel.

• He ran out of time.

• He had difficulty uncoiling his coils.

• He broke his grinder.

What material did Jordan use for his blade?

• Stainless steel

• Damascus steel

• Cable 1084 steel

• W-2 steel

What feature did Jordan add to his blade to show skill?

• A decorative handle

• An integral bolster

• A mirror finish

• A serrated edge

What aspect of David's blade did the judges appreciate?

• Its lightweight design

• The clearly defined edge

• The colorful pattern

• The long handle

What was intentionally left on David's blade?

• A rough edge

• A sharp point

• A forged texture

• A rusted surface

Which bladesmith's work was noted for having a very clearly defined edge?

• David

• Jordan

• Rick

• Karl

What adversity did Karl face while working on his blade?

• He lost his tools.

• He got burned and injured.

• He ran out of materials.

• He was disqualified.

What was the judges' main criticism of Karl's blade?

• It was too heavy.

• It lacked refinement.

• It was too sharp.

• It was too short.

What type of steel did Karl use for his blade?

• Stainless steel

• Carbon steel

• W-2 steel

• Damascus steel

What did the judges prepare to do at the end of the evaluation?

• Start a new competition

• Take a break

• Announce the results

• Re-evaluate the blades