Escaping the "Should" Trap: Mental Health & Social Comparison

Dr. Tracy Marks discusses the impact of comparison and should statements on mental health. She identifies sources of these statements, such as family expectations and societal norms, and explains how they can lead to cognitive distortions. The video provides strategies to challenge and reframe these thoughts, emphasizing the importance of self-compassion and aligning actions with personal values.

What is the primary effect of 'should' statements on individuals?

• They boost self-esteem.

• They enhance decision-making skills.

• They undermine confidence and security.

• They improve social interactions.

Which of the following is NOT a source of 'should' statements?

• Family expectations

• Past experiences

• Societal norms

• Random chance

How can one begin to challenge 'should' statements?

• By ignoring them completely

• By identifying and questioning their origins

• By accepting them as absolute truths

• By comparing them with others' expectations

What is a key step in reframing 'should' statements?

• Avoiding self-reflection

• Setting higher expectations

• Aligning with personal values

• Focusing on external validation

Which exercise is suggested for practicing self-compassion?

• The societal norms evaluation

• The perfectionism challenge

• The critical self-analysis exercise

• The gentle friend exercise

What is the purpose of the self-compassion companion?

• To set rigid life goals

• To encourage competition with peers

• To offer self-compassion phrases for various situations

• To provide a list of criticisms

What is a common theme in overcoming 'should' statements?

• Focusing solely on career advancement

• Avoiding any form of self-reflection

• Embracing flexibility and personal growth

• Rigid adherence to societal timelines