Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The video discusses the evolution of sentencing guidelines from mandatory to discretionary due to constitutional issues. These guidelines, while not obligatory, still significantly influence judicial sentencing in federal courts. Many states have adopted similar discretionary guidelines, particularly affecting corporate defendants who face monetary penalties instead of jail time.

What was the original nature of the sentencing guidelines developed in the 1980s?

• They were discretionary.

• They were mandatory.

• They were optional.

• They were advisory.

Why did the sentencing guidelines become discretionary?

• Due to changes in federal law.

• Because of constitutional issues.

• To align with state laws.

• To allow more flexibility for judges.

How do sentencing guidelines influence federal court decisions?

• They are strictly followed by judges.

• They provide a framework for judges.

• They are ignored by most judges.

• They are only used in state courts.

What is a key feature of state-adopted sentencing guidelines?

• They are mandatory for all cases.

• They focus on jail time for corporate defendants.

• They are non-mandatory but influential.

• They are only applicable to individual defendants.

What type of punishment do state guidelines often focus on for corporate defendants?

• Community service.

• Jail time.

• Probation.

• Monetary fines.