TED: The military case for sharing knowledge | Stanley McChrystal

The speaker reflects on their military experience, emphasizing the fallibility of instincts and the importance of information security. They recount the 2010 Pentagon leak and their operations against al Qaeda in Iraq. A cultural shift from secrecy to information sharing is highlighted, demonstrating the benefits of declassification. The talk concludes with a reflection on the importance of sharing and a discussion on Edward Snowden's actions.

What was a major consequence of the 2010 Pentagon leak?

• It led to the end of the Iraq War.

• It raised questions about information access and security.

• It resulted in the resignation of the President.

• It caused a global economic crisis.

What was the primary mission of the Special Operations Task Force in Iraq?

• To establish a new government.

• To defeat Al Qaeda in Iraq.

• To train local police forces.

• To secure oil fields.

What cultural shift did the speaker emphasize regarding information sharing?

• From digital to paper records.

• From open sharing to strict secrecy.

• From 'need to know' to 'who doesn't know'.

• From individual to group decision-making.

What was the speaker's view on the value of information?

• Information loses value when shared widely.

• Information is only valuable if shared with those who can act on it.

• Information should always be kept secret to maintain power.

• Information is most valuable when stored securely.

What example did the speaker give to illustrate the benefits of sharing information?

• Publishing a book on military tactics.

• Declassifying personnel records in 2007.

• Creating a public database of intelligence reports.

• Holding a press conference about operations.

What concern did the speaker express about withholding information?

• It can cause more harm than leaks.

• It can lead to financial losses.

• It can improve organizational efficiency.

• It can enhance national security.

What was the speaker's stance on making judgments about Edward Snowden?

• Immediate judgments should be made.

• Judgments should be based on all the facts.

• Snowden's actions were entirely justified.

• Snowden should be pardoned without question.