Measuring Reaction Times through the Ruler Drop Test: Investigating the Effect of Practice

Measuring Reaction Times through the Ruler Drop Test: Investigating the Effect of Practice

Assessment

Interactive Video

Biology, Physics, Science

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explores reaction times through an experiment conducted by Jacob and Catherine. It defines reaction time, sets up a hypothesis that practice can reduce reaction times, and describes the ruler drop test used to measure it. The experiment is conducted multiple times, and results are analyzed to identify anomalies and calculate averages. The findings suggest that practice may improve reaction times, but improvements may plateau. The video also discusses other factors that could affect reaction times and suggests conducting tests in controlled environments.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the hypothesis being tested in the experiment?

Reaction times can be reduced with practice.

Reaction times remain constant regardless of practice.

Reaction times increase with practice.

Reaction times are not measurable.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In the ruler drop test, what is used as an indicator of reaction time?

The speed of the ruler.

The distance the ruler falls.

The color of the ruler.

The weight of the ruler.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the reaction time if the ruler falls 14 centimeters?

0.19 seconds

0.25 seconds

0.21 seconds

0.17 seconds

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why were some results considered anomalous in the initial analysis?

They were too low compared to others.

They were significantly different from the majority.

They were exactly the same as others.

They were not recorded properly.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Catherine's average reaction time in the first set of tests?

0.250 seconds

0.203 seconds

0.210 seconds

0.194 seconds

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the second set of results compare to the first in terms of anomalies?

The second set had no anomalies.

The second set had fewer anomalies.

The second set had more anomalies.

The second set was not analyzed for anomalies.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What conclusion can be drawn from the first four sets of attempts?

Reaction times remained constant.

Reaction times decreased.

Reaction times increased.

Reaction times were unpredictable.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?