Students ask Park Ranger Shelton Johnson About Bringing Diverse Youth to Parks

The video discusses the lack of cultural diversity in national parks, highlighting that while people from various national origins visit, ethnic diversity is limited. It explores the potential societal benefits of increased diversity, such as universal ownership and inclusion. Programs like Nature Bridge and Wild Link are mentioned as successful models for engaging diverse youth. The video advocates for expanding these programs nationally to address the issue comprehensively.

What is the main difference in diversity between international and domestic visitors to national parks?

• International visitors are more diverse than domestic visitors.

• Domestic visitors are more diverse than international visitors.

• Both international and domestic visitors have the same level of diversity.

• There is no diversity among international visitors.

How might increased diversity in national parks affect society?

• It will make national parks less popular.

• It will create a sense of universal ownership and connection.

• It will lead to more restrictions in national parks.

• It will decrease the number of visitors.

What is the purpose of programs like Nature Bridge and Wild Link?

• To increase park fees.

• To provide park experiences to underrepresented groups.

• To promote international tourism.

• To limit access to national parks.

What is suggested as a solution to the lack of diversity in national parks?

• Reducing the number of parks.

• Expanding existing programs on a national scale.

• Increasing park entry fees.

• Limiting access to certain groups.

What is the main goal of expanding programs like Nature Bridge and Wild Link?

• To provide wilderness experiences to urban youth nationwide.

• To decrease the number of park visitors.

• To promote international travel.

• To increase park revenue.