TED-ED: What happened to trial by jury? - Suja A. Thomas

TED-ED: What happened to trial by jury? - Suja A. Thomas

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

KG - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explores the history and evolution of jury systems, starting from ancient societies to their establishment in England and the US. It discusses the decline of jury trials in the US due to plea bargaining and summary judgment, which have reduced the role of juries in both criminal and civil cases. The video also examines arbitration as an alternative to jury trials, highlighting potential biases and issues. It concludes by weighing the pros and cons of jury trials, emphasizing their importance in representing the general population and checking governmental power.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was one of the primary roles of juries when they were first introduced in England?

To create laws

To decide on the guilt of defendants

To manage public funds

To elect government officials

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one reason for the decline in jury trials in the US?

Public distrust in the legal system

High cost of jury trials

Lack of qualified jurors

Increased use of plea bargaining

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution affected jury trials?

It has eliminated the need for juries in civil cases

It has made jury trials mandatory for all cases

It has allowed for more summary judgments

It has increased the number of jury trials

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential disadvantage of arbitration compared to jury trials?

Arbitrators are less knowledgeable than jurors

Arbitration is more time-consuming

Arbitration is more expensive

Arbitrators may be biased towards companies

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might juries be considered advantageous in the legal system?

They always make the correct decision

They are more representative of the general population

They are less costly than other methods

They are faster than other legal processes