Ex-Deputy National Security Adviser Skips Impeachment Deposition

Charles Kupperman, former Deputy National Security Adviser, did not attend his scheduled deposition, defying a congressional subpoena. He filed a lawsuit seeking clarity on whether he must comply, citing constitutional immunity claimed by the Trump administration. The House committees leading the impeachment inquiry dismissed the lawsuit as a delay tactic and threatened contempt. Kupperman was present during the July 25 call where President Trump allegedly pressured Ukrainian President Zelensky to investigate political opponents. House Democrats are keen to hear from Kupperman and John Bolton as part of the inquiry.

What action did Charles Kupperman take in response to the congressional subpoena?

• He complied with the subpoena.

• He ignored the subpoena.

• He filed a lawsuit seeking clarity.

• He resigned from his position.

How did the House committees view Kupperman's lawsuit?

• As a misunderstanding of the law.

• As a tactic to delay the proceedings.

• As a valid legal challenge.

• As a sign of cooperation.

What legal argument did the House committees make regarding Kupperman's lawsuit?

• The lawsuit was filed in the wrong court.

• The lawsuit was based on new legal grounds.

• A private citizen cannot sue Congress to avoid a subpoena.

• A private citizen can sue Congress to avoid a subpoena.

What was Kupperman's role during the July 25th phone call?

• He was a top aide to John Bolton.

• He was the President's legal advisor.

• He was the Ukrainian President's advisor.

• He was a member of the House committee.

Why are House Democrats interested in hearing from John Bolton?

• He has resigned from his position.

• He has filed a lawsuit against Congress.

• He was directly involved in the phone call.

• He is a key figure in the impeachment inquiry.