Kant & Categorical Imperatives: Crash Course Philosophy

Kant & Categorical Imperatives: Crash Course Philosophy

Assessment

Interactive Video

Religious Studies, Other, Social Studies

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explores Kant's moral philosophy, contrasting it with divine command theory and natural law. Kant argues that morality is derived from reason, not religion, and introduces the concepts of hypothetical and categorical imperatives. The universalizability principle and the idea of treating people as ends-in-themselves are key aspects of Kant's ethics. Through thought experiments, the video illustrates Kant's views on lying and moral obligations. The video concludes by hinting at utilitarianism as a contrasting ethical theory.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Kant believe is the source of moral truths?

Personal desires

Divine command

Cultural norms

Pure reason

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Kant differentiate between hypothetical and categorical imperatives?

Hypothetical imperatives depend on desires, while categorical imperatives are unconditional.

Hypothetical imperatives are moral obligations, while categorical imperatives are not.

Both are based on religious beliefs.

Both are dependent on cultural context.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does Kant argue that moral laws are binding on everyone?

Because they are based on pure reason

Because they are derived from cultural practices

Because they are enforced by law

Because they are based on religious teachings

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to Kant, what happens if an action is universalized and leads to a contradiction?

The action becomes a cultural norm.

The action is considered a personal choice.

The action is not morally permissible.

The action is morally acceptable.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In Kant's view, why is lying never permissible?

It is against cultural norms.

It violates the principle of treating people as ends.

It is not a universalizable action.

It is a hypothetical imperative.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Kant mean by treating people as 'ends-in-themselves'?

Recognizing their autonomy and rationality

Using people for personal gain

Ignoring their personal goals

Treating them as objects

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main focus of Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative?

The universality of actions

The autonomy and rationality of individuals

The importance of cultural norms

The role of religion in ethics