Wide availability of PM's phone number 'a security risk', says Starmer

The transcript discusses the security risk posed by the Prime Minister's phone number, the controversy over the funding of his flat refurbishment, and the Labour Party's focus on jobs, NHS, and crime reduction. It also highlights the need for independent oversight in government matters and the impact of Brexit on fishing communities.

What was the main security concern regarding the Prime Minister's personal number?

• It allowed privileged access to the Prime Minister.

• It was linked to a financial scandal.

• It was leaked to the public.

• It was being used for unauthorized transactions.

What is the main issue with the Prime Minister's flat refurbishment?

• The quality of the refurbishment.

• The initial funding source is undisclosed.

• The design was not approved by Parliament.

• The refurbishment was incomplete.

What are the Labour Party's main priorities under the current leadership?

• Expanding international trade and tourism.

• Focusing on jobs, NHS, and reducing crime.

• Improving public transport and education.

• Reducing taxes and increasing defense spending.

Why is it important for someone independent to investigate the Prime Minister's actions?

• To reduce the cost of the investigation.

• To ensure a fair and unbiased assessment.

• To involve more political parties.

• To speed up the investigation process.

What criticism did the Labour leader face regarding his visit to John Lewis?

• He was accused of playing politics.

• He was criticized for spending too much.

• He was criticized for not wearing a mask.

• He was accused of ignoring local businesses.

What was the promise made to fishing communities regarding Brexit?

• They would receive financial compensation.

• They would have access to new markets.

• They would get new fishing equipment.

• Their ports would thrive again.

What was the outcome of the Norway-UK deal for fishing communities?

• It provided new fishing quotas.

• It led to increased exports.

• It did not materialize, affecting fishing communities.

• It was successfully implemented.