What does the Supreme Court's immunity ruling mean for Trump's federal election interference case?

What does the Supreme Court's immunity ruling mean for Trump's federal election interference case?

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

Retired Judge Shira Shindlin discusses the complexities of a legal case involving Judge Chutkin. The conversation covers the concept of immunity, the challenges faced by the prosecution, and the distinction between official and unofficial acts. The discussion highlights the potential for appeals and the lengthy process ahead, with implications for the upcoming election. The case may never reach trial if political circumstances change.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who appointed Judge Shira Shindlin to the federal bench?

President George W. Bush

President Donald Trump

President Bill Clinton

President Barack Obama

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main challenge for the prosecution due to the concept of presumptive immunity?

Proving the act was committed by the defendant

Proving the act was a private matter

Proving the act was not official

Proving the act was within the core constitutional acts

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the four counts mentioned in the case?

Conspiracy to divide, deprive people of the right to vote

Conspiracy to obstruct justice

Conspiracy to commit perjury

Conspiracy to commit fraud

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the discussion, what might delay the trial until after the election?

The lack of a presiding judge

The need for additional evidence

The complexity of the case

The potential for multiple appeals

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What example is given to illustrate an act that is clearly not official?

Granting a presidential pardon

Discussing foreign policy

Appointing an ambassador

Sending checks to pay off a porn star

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Chief Justice Roberts say about dividing official from unofficial conduct?

Courts may inquire into the President's motives

Courts may not inquire into the President's motives

Courts should always consider the President's motives

Courts should ignore the President's motives

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What might happen if the defendant wins the presidency according to the discussion?

The case will be retried

The Justice Department may dismiss the case

The case will be moved to a different court

The case will be expedited