Social Media's Role in Radicalization

Social Media's Role in Radicalization

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the role of social media in radicalizing individuals in the US, highlighting a study showing a significant increase in online radicalization from 2011 to 2016. It covers a meeting at the White House with tech companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google to address domestic terrorism. The video also examines the formation of a coalition to combat online terror and the challenges faced by tech companies, including criticisms from lawmakers. It concludes with a discussion on content moderation, free speech, and the varying community standards of different platforms.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What percentage of radicalization cases involved social media from 2011 to 2016?

73%

90%

26%

50%

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main focus of the White House meeting discussed in the transcript?

Environmental regulations

Domestic terrorism and online extremism

Healthcare reform

International trade policies

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What criticism did Congressman Max Rose have about the coalition against online terrorism?

No public building or full-time staff

Lack of international cooperation

Too much focus on social media

Ignoring traditional media

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major challenge faced by tech companies in removing extremist content?

Lack of technology

Defining what constitutes extremist content

Insufficient funding

Too many platforms to monitor

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which government body is investigating Google's ad business?

Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Department of Justice (DOJ)

Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a concern regarding the removal of certain types of content from platforms?

It might violate international laws

It could lead to censorship of protected speech

It requires government approval

It is too costly for companies

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the stance of some tech companies on hate speech and white supremacist content?

They should be allowed under free speech

They should be removed from platforms

They should be monitored but not removed

They should be reported to the government