Erdogan Says Most Jailed Journalists Are Terrorists

The transcript discusses the issue of journalists imprisoned in Turkey, with the speaker clarifying that many are not journalists but terrorists involved in criminal activities. The speaker compares the situation to the US, highlighting differences in handling criticism and free speech. An incident involving demonstrators and security guards is recounted, with criticism of the American judiciary's response. The discussion concludes with political implications and legal actions taken against the speaker's security personnel.

What is the main defense given for the imprisonment of journalists in Turkey?

• They are not real journalists but terrorists.

• They have violated international laws.

• They are guilty of treason.

• They have criticized the government.

How does the speaker describe the judiciary in Turkey?

• Independent and fair

• Influenced by the government

• Corrupt and biased

• Similar to the American judiciary

What was the reaction of the police during the demonstrations in the U.S.?

• They supported the demonstrators.

• They arrested the demonstrators.

• They ignored the demonstrators.

• They actively intervened.

What action did the speaker's guards take during the demonstrations?

• They called the police for help.

• They intervened in the situation.

• They sang patriotic songs.

• They joined the demonstrators.

What was the speaker's main concern regarding the investigation into his guards?

• The guards were guilty.

• The guards were not present at the scene.

• The investigation was politically motivated.

• The investigation was conducted by the federal government.

Who did the speaker discuss the investigation with?

• The American police

• The Turkish judiciary

• The demonstrators

• President Trump

What did the speaker hope for regarding the investigation?

• That it would be dropped.

• That it would be transferred to the federal government.

• That it would be fair.

• That it would be expedited.