'Vaccine Diplomacy' Amid the Covid-19 Outbreak

The transcript discusses the geopolitical dynamics surrounding vaccine distribution, highlighting the tension between vaccine nationalism and diplomacy. It emphasizes the importance of multilateral systems for equitable vaccine access and the challenges posed by a lack of global trust and leadership. The role of superpowers and middle nations in vaccine distribution is also explored, with a call for stronger multilateral cooperation.

What is the main concern with vaccine nationalism according to the transcript?

• It creates a false sense of security.

• It ensures quick vaccine distribution.

• It leads to economic growth.

• It promotes global cooperation.

How is vaccine diplomacy described in the transcript?

• As a form of soft power.

• As a form of hard power.

• As a humanitarian effort.

• As a multilateral agreement.

What is identified as the missing ingredient in ensuring equitable access to vaccines?

• Increased funding.

• Global leadership.

• Better technology.

• More institutions.

Why is there a trust deficit in global vaccine distribution efforts?

• Lack of scientific research.

• Absence of clear communication.

• Overabundance of vaccines.

• Excessive global leadership.

What role did the Security Council and G7 play during the Ebola outbreak?

• They developed a vaccine.

• They imposed travel bans.

• They led the multilateral response.

• They provided financial aid.

What is the suggested strategy for middle nations to secure vaccine supplies?

• Developing their own vaccines.

• Investing in multilateral systems.

• Relying on bilateral agreements.

• Forming regional alliances.

What is the main advantage of multilateral systems for countries like New Zealand?

• They require less political investment.

• They are less complicated to manage.

• They ensure a fair distribution of resources.

• They are faster than bilateral agreements.