Why Justice Clarence Thomas Finally Broke His Silence

Why Justice Clarence Thomas Finally Broke His Silence

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses Justice Clarence Thomas's silence during Supreme Court oral arguments, which lasted over a decade. It explores the historical context of court arguments, the influence of Justice Scalia, and the changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic led to telephonic arguments, prompting Thomas to become more vocal. The transcript also debates the effectiveness of a hot bench versus a cold bench, highlighting Thomas's current role as a leading questioner.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice Clarence Thomas's view on the nature of the Supreme Court's oral arguments?

He found them to be orderly and productive.

He thought they were too formal.

He compared them to a game show.

He believed they were too short.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the historical Supreme Court arguments differ from today's?

They were shorter and less formal.

They were longer and more similar to the British system.

They involved more justices.

They were conducted in private.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the impact of Justice Scalia on the Supreme Court's questioning style?

He preferred written arguments over oral ones.

He was an avid questioner, influencing others to ask more questions.

He encouraged a more passive approach.

He discouraged asking questions.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What event led to Justice Thomas becoming more vocal during oral arguments?

The introduction of a new court rule.

The appointment of a new Chief Justice.

The death of Justice Scalia.

The COVID-19 pandemic.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the COVID-19 pandemic change the Supreme Court's oral argument procedures?

Only written submissions were accepted.

Arguments were postponed indefinitely.

Each justice asked questions in order of seniority over the phone.

Arguments were held in person with limited attendance.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one argument against the 'hot bench' style of questioning?

It limits the participation of junior justices.

It reduces the number of cases heard.

It makes the arguments too lengthy.

It allows justices to express personal views rather than being impartial.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might Justice Thomas be speaking out more in recent years?

He is now the Chief Justice.

He disagrees with the current court's direction.

He is considered the ideological leader of the court.

He has always been vocal.