Candidato del PRI mexicano promete combatir corrupción

The transcript discusses the concept of presidential immunity and the importance of having an independent Attorney General to investigate potential misdeeds by the President or administration officials. The speaker emphasizes the rule of law, stating that the President should not be above the Attorney General in terms of investigative capacity. The speaker also highlights global practices in countries like Singapore, Hong Kong, Italy, and the US, where those combating corruption have full autonomy. The discussion concludes with a clarification that immunity should not be decided by the President, reinforcing the need for an autonomous Attorney General's office.

What is the speaker's stance on presidential immunity?

• The president should have immunity only during their term.

• The president should not have immunity and be subject to the law.

• The president should have complete immunity.

• The president should decide on their own immunity.

According to the speaker, who should have the authority to investigate the president?

• The cabinet members

• The vice president

• An autonomous attorney general

• The president themselves

Which countries are mentioned as examples where anti-corruption bodies have full autonomy?

• India and Pakistan

• Russia and China

• Singapore and Hong Kong

• Brazil and Argentina

What does the speaker suggest about immunity for past presidents?

• It should be decided by the current president.

• There should be no immunity for past presidents.

• It should be decided by a public vote.

• It should be granted to all past presidents.

What is the fundamental misunderstanding about the rule of law according to the speaker?

• Believing the rule of law is not important

• Thinking the attorney general is above the law

• Believing the president can decide on investigations

• Assuming the president is always right