CLEAN : UN official slams Trump over torture support

The transcript discusses the international community's stance on torture, emphasizing the dangers of ignoring past lessons. It critiques President Trump's willingness to use torture, highlighting the potential global repercussions and the undermining of international norms. The text warns of the risks associated with reintroducing torture, including unreliable intelligence and increased terrorism threats.

Why is it crucial for the international community to remain vigilant against torture, even if it has stopped?

• To promote cultural exchange

• To ensure the safety of political leaders

• To prevent the reintroduction of harmful interrogation methods

• To maintain economic stability

What was President Trump's position on the use of torture in the fight against terrorism?

• He opposed it strongly

• He supported and was willing to authorize it

• He suggested it should be used only in extreme cases

• He was indifferent to it

How might President Trump's stance on torture affect international norms?

• It would have no impact on international norms

• It could lead to more countries abolishing torture

• It might undermine the prohibition on torture

• It could strengthen international laws against torture

What precedent does a U.S. President advocating for torture set for other nations?

• It discourages the use of torture globally

• It has no effect on other nations

• It leads to increased diplomatic relations

• It encourages other nations to follow suit

What are the potential risks of advocating for torture, according to the final section?

• It could result in technological advancements

• It would improve international relations

• It might produce unreliable intelligence and increase terrorism

• It could lead to economic growth